Literature DB >> 16076479

Cadmium, mercury and selenium concentrations in mink (Mustela vison) from Yukon, Canada.

Mary Gamberg1, Gail Boila, Gary Stern, Patrick Roach.   

Abstract

Mercury (total and methyl), cadmium and selenium concentrations were measured in liver, kidney and brain tissue from mink trapped from the Yukon Territory from 2001-2002. None of these metals was found at levels of toxicological concern. Total mercury averaged 0.66, 0.92 and 0.22 microg g-1 in mink kidney, liver and brain tissue respectively, while methyl mercury averaged 0.77, 0.85 and 0.21 microg g-1 in the same tissues. Selenium averaged 2.07, 1.40 and 0.39 microg g-1 in mink kidney, liver and brain tissue, while cadmium was only measured in kidneys and averaged 0.22 microg g-1. All element concentrations are presented on a wet weight basis. Concentrations of total mercury in all tissues were significantly higher in female than male mink, possibly reflecting proportionally greater food consumption by the smaller females. Total mercury concentrations were inversely related to the proportion of mercury present as methylmercury, and positively related to concentrations of selenium, consistent with increasing demethylation of methylmercury, and the formation of mercuric selenide as total concentrations of mercury increased. This relationship was seen most strongly in mink liver, less so in kidneys and not at all in brains where most of the mercury was maintained in the methyl form. There did not appear to be any geographical areas in which mink had obviously higher concentrations of mercury, and there was frequently a relatively large range of mercury levels found in mink from a given trapline. Mink diet may be a factor in this variation. Local environmental levels of cadmium were not reflected in cadmium concentrations in mink tissues. Mercury, cadmium and selenium do not appear to constitute environmental hazards to mink in the Yukon.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16076479     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.07.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of the suitability of application of golden jackal (Canis aureus) hair as a noninvasive technique for determination of body burden mercury.

Authors:  Hassan Malvandi; Seyed Mahmoud Ghasempouri; Abbas Esmaili-Sari; Nader Bahramifar
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  Mercury and other heavy metals in free-ranging mink of the lower Great Lakes basin, Canada, 1998-2006.

Authors:  Pamela A Martin; Tana V McDaniel; Kimberley D Hughes; Bruce Hunter
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2011-08-28       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Hair and bone as predictors of tissular mercury concentration in the western Alaska red fox, Vulpes vulpes.

Authors:  B H Dainowski; L K Duffy; J McIntyre; P Jones
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 7.963

4.  Environmental contaminants in male river otters from Oregon and Washington, USA, 1994-1999.

Authors:  Robert A Grove; Charles J Henny
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 2.513

5.  Comparison of hepatic and nephric total mercury concentrations between feral and ranch American mink (Neovison vison) from northwestern Poland.

Authors:  Elzbieta Kalisinska; Halina Budis; Natalia Lanocha; Joanna Podlasinska; Ewa Jedrzejewska; Danuta I Kosik-Bogacka
Journal:  Bull Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.151

6.  The use of chemical markers for the identification of farm escapees in feral mink populations.

Authors:  Marcin Brzeziński; Andrzej Zalewski; Agnieszka Niemczynowicz; Ingeborga Jarzyna; Małgorzata Suska-Malawska
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Brains of Native and Alien Mesocarnivores in Biomonitoring of Toxic Metals in Europe.

Authors:  Elzbieta Kalisinska; Natalia Lanocha-Arendarczyk; Danuta Kosik-Bogacka; Halina Budis; Joanna Podlasinska; Marcin Popiolek; Agnieszka Pirog; Ewa Jedrzejewska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.