BACKGROUND AND METHODS: A consecutive series of all 78 incident cases of intraoral squamous cell carcinoma occurring during a 2-year period in a population of 1.4 million inhabitants were evaluated by histologic score (the modified classification of Jacobsson et al.), flow cytometry, stereology, tumor size, and the TNM classification. RESULTS: The investigation showed a significant difference between the volume-weighted mean nuclear volume (nuclear vv) of oral leukoplakia (n = 29) and oral squamous cell carcinomas (P = 0.001). The value of the parameters as prognostic indicators of survival and recurrence was tested with Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox multiple hazard regression analysis. Tumor size, T-stage, stereologically estimated nuclear vv, and mean nuclear profile area were all of significant prognostic value in single factor analysis with reference to both survival and recurrence. The histologic parameters of mitotic activity, morphologic nuclear dedifferentiation, and histologic mean malignancy score and the DNA ploidy level had no prognostic value. A prognostic index based on the results of the Cox analysis that included T-stage and nuclear vv was correlated highly with survival (P = 0.00001) and recurrence (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: These findings may contribute to optimal and individualized therapy.
BACKGROUND AND METHODS: A consecutive series of all 78 incident cases of intraoral squamous cell carcinoma occurring during a 2-year period in a population of 1.4 million inhabitants were evaluated by histologic score (the modified classification of Jacobsson et al.), flow cytometry, stereology, tumor size, and the TNM classification. RESULTS: The investigation showed a significant difference between the volume-weighted mean nuclear volume (nuclear vv) of oral leukoplakia (n = 29) and oral squamous cell carcinomas (P = 0.001). The value of the parameters as prognostic indicators of survival and recurrence was tested with Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox multiple hazard regression analysis. Tumor size, T-stage, stereologically estimated nuclear vv, and mean nuclear profile area were all of significant prognostic value in single factor analysis with reference to both survival and recurrence. The histologic parameters of mitotic activity, morphologic nuclear dedifferentiation, and histologic mean malignancy score and the DNA ploidy level had no prognostic value. A prognostic index based on the results of the Cox analysis that included T-stage and nuclear vv was correlated highly with survival (P = 0.00001) and recurrence (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION: These findings may contribute to optimal and individualized therapy.