Literature DB >> 16061309

Recovery of sensation in the skin of non-innervated radial flaps after subfascial and suprafascial dissection.

C M E Avery1, M Iqbal, J P Hayter.   

Abstract

We compared the extent of recovery of sensation in 40 non-innervated radial free flaps, 20 of which had been raised subfascially and 20 suprafascially. We found no significant difference in sensory recovery between the two groups. The mean extent of sensory recovery was light touch (68%); sharp touch (84%); warm (29%) and cold (40%) temperature; and static (25%) and moving (31%) two-point discrimination. Nearly all the flaps responded to at least one stimulus (excluding two-point discrimination) and half of them to three or more. Sharp touch sensation in the flap was similar to that in the surrounding tissues and light touch was less sensitive. There was no dysaesthesia. Recovery was not related to sex, age, alcohol consumption, or site of reconstruction. Smoking and radiotherapy had a slight effect.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16061309     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2005.06.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 0266-4356            Impact factor:   1.651


  2 in total

1.  A comparison of full and split thickness skin grafts in radial forearm donor sites.

Authors:  Wellington J Davis; Cindy Wu; David Sieber; Darl K Vandevender
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2011-03-18

2.  Tactile recovery assessment with shortened Semmes-Weinstein monofilaments in patients with buccinator myomucosal flap oral cavity reconstructions.

Authors:  Luigi Angelo Vaira; Olindo Massarelli; Roberta Gobbi; Andrea Biglio; Giacomo De Riu
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-02-02
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.