Literature DB >> 1606113

Objective measurement of anxiety in hypertensive pregnant women managed in hospital and in the community.

W Cartwright1, K J Dalton, H Swindells, S Rushant, P Mooney.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether pregnant hypertensives women are more anxious when monitored in hospital or at homes.
DESIGN: Prospective randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Rosie Maternity Hospital and women's homes.
SUBJECTS: Ninety-nine pregnant hypertensive women: 50 had their blood pressure measured telemetrically from home, and 49 had it measured in hospital. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of episodes of monitoring, duration of monitoring, mean blood pressure during monitoring, gestational age at delivery, trait and state anxiety levels.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences in anxiety levels, or in any other outcome measure, between the home and hospital groups.
CONCLUSION: When blood pressure is being monitored serially in pregnant hypertensive women, there is no measurable difference in their anxiety levels, whether they are in hospital or at home.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1606113     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1992.tb14495.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  7 in total

Review 1.  The management of pregnancy in hypertensive patients.

Authors:  R D Tunbridge
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Blood pressure control by home monitoring: meta-analysis of randomised trials.

Authors:  Francesco P Cappuccio; Sally M Kerry; Lindsay Forbes; Anna Donald
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-11

Review 3.  Clinical outcomes resulting from telemedicine interventions: a systematic review.

Authors:  W R Hersh; M Helfand; J Wallace; D Kraemer; P Patterson; S Shapiro; M Greenlick
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2001-11-26       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Blood pressure self-monitoring in pregnancy: examining feasibility in a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Katherine L Tucker; Kathryn S Taylor; Carole Crawford; James A Hodgkinson; Clare Bankhead; Tricia Carver; Elizabeth Ewers; Margaret Glogowska; Sheila M Greenfield; Lucy Ingram; Lisa Hinton; Khalid S Khan; Louise Locock; Lucy Mackillop; Christine McCourt; Alexander M Pirie; Richard Stevens; Richard J McManus
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 5.  Interactive telemedicine: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes.

Authors:  Gerd Flodgren; Antoine Rachas; Andrew J Farmer; Marco Inzitari; Sasha Shepperd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-07

Review 6.  Exploring the Use of Telemonitoring for Patients at High Risk for Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy in the Antepartum and Postpartum Periods: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Maria Aquino; Sarah Munce; Janessa Griffith; Maureen Pakosh; Mikayla Munnery; Emily Seto
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 4.773

7.  How Do Home and Clinic Blood Pressure Readings Compare in Pregnancy?

Authors:  Katherine L Tucker; Clare Bankhead; James Hodgkinson; Nia Roberts; Richard Stevens; Carl Heneghan; Évelyne Rey; Chern Lo; Manju Chandiramani; Rennae S Taylor; Robyn A North; Asma Khalil; Kathryn Marko; Jason Waugh; Mark Brown; Carole Crawford; Kathryn S Taylor; Lucy Mackillop; Richard J McManus
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 10.190

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.