Literature DB >> 16060938

Application of magnetoencephalography in epilepsy patients with widespread spike or slow-wave activity.

Hideaki Shiraishi1, Seppo P Ahlfors, Steven M Stufflebeam, Kyoko Takano, Maki Okajima, Susanne Knake, Keisaku Hatanaka, Shinobu Kohsaka, Shinji Saitoh, Anders M Dale, Eric Halgren.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To examine whether magnetoencephalography (MEG) can be used to determine patterns of brain activity underlying widespread paroxysms of epilepsy patients, thereby extending the applicability of MEG to a larger population of epilepsy patients.
METHODS: We studied two children with symptomatic localization-related epilepsy. Case 1 had widespread spikes in EEG with an operation scar from a resection of a brain tumor; Case 2 had hemispheric slow-wave activity in EEG with sensory auras. MEG was collected with a 204-channel helmet-shaped sensor array. Dynamic statistical parametric maps (dSPMs) were constructed to estimate the cortical distribution of interictal discharges for these patients. Equivalent current dipoles (ECDs) also were calculated for comparison with the results of dSPM.
RESULTS: In case 1 with widespread spikes, dSPM presented the major activity at the vicinity of the operation scar in the left frontal lobe at the peak of the spikes, and some activities were detected in the left temporal lobe just before the peak in some spikes. In case 2 with hemispheric slow waves, the most active area was located in the left parietal lobe, and additional activity was seen at the ipsilateral temporal and frontal lobes in dSPM. The source estimates correlated well with the ictal manifestation and interictal single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) findings for this patient. In comparison with the results of ECDs, ECDs could not express a prior activity at the left temporal lobe in case 1 and did not model well the MEG data in case 2.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that by means of dSPM, MEG is useful for presurgical evaluation of patients, not only with localized epileptiform activity, but also with widespread spikes or slow waves, because it requires no selections of channels and no time-point selection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16060938     DOI: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2005.65504.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  21 in total

Review 1.  Magnetoencephalography for pediatric epilepsy: how we do it.

Authors:  E S Schwartz; D J Dlugos; P B Storm; J Dell; R Magee; T P Flynn; D M Zarnow; R A Zimmerman; T P L Roberts
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Comparison of three methods for localizing interictal epileptiform discharges with magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  Hideaki Shiraishi; Seppo P Ahlfors; Steven M Stufflebeam; Susanne Knake; Pål G Larsson; Matti S Hämäläinen; Kyoko Takano; Maki Okajima; Keisaku Hatanaka; Shinji Saitoh; Anders M Dale; Eric Halgren
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.177

3.  Different cortical involvement pattern of generalized and localized spasms: a magnetoencephalography study.

Authors:  Yosuke Kakisaka; Ajay Gupta; Zhong I Wang; Anne-Sophie Dubarry; Andreas V Alexopoulos; John C Mosher; Richard C Burgess
Journal:  Epilepsy Behav       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 2.937

4.  Electroencephalographic inverse localization of brain activity in acute traumatic brain injury as a guide to surgery, monitoring and treatment.

Authors:  Andrei Irimia; S-Y Matthew Goh; Carinna M Torgerson; Nathan R Stein; Micah C Chambers; Paul M Vespa; John D Van Horn
Journal:  Clin Neurol Neurosurg       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 1.876

5.  Source connectivity analysis from MEG and its application to epilepsy source localization.

Authors:  Yakang Dai; Wenbo Zhang; Deanna L Dickens; Bin He
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2011-11-19       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  An assessment of MEG coherence imaging in the study of temporal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Kost Elisevich; Neetu Shukla; John E Moran; Brien Smith; Lonni Schultz; Karen Mason; Gregory L Barkley; Norman Tepley; Valentina Gumenyuk; Susan M Bowyer
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 5.864

Review 7.  Electrophysiological Source Imaging: A Noninvasive Window to Brain Dynamics.

Authors:  Bin He; Abbas Sohrabpour; Emery Brown; Zhongming Liu
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 9.590

Review 8.  IFCN-endorsed practical guidelines for clinical magnetoencephalography (MEG).

Authors:  Riitta Hari; Sylvain Baillet; Gareth Barnes; Richard Burgess; Nina Forss; Joachim Gross; Matti Hämäläinen; Ole Jensen; Ryusuke Kakigi; François Mauguière; Nobukatzu Nakasato; Aina Puce; Gian-Luca Romani; Alfons Schnitzler; Samu Taulu
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Propagation of epileptic spikes reconstructed from spatiotemporal magnetoencephalographic and electroencephalographic source analysis.

Authors:  Naoaki Tanaka; Matti S Hämäläinen; Seppo P Ahlfors; Hesheng Liu; Joseph R Madsen; Blaise F Bourgeois; Jong Woo Lee; Barbara A Dworetzky; John W Belliveau; Steven M Stufflebeam
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Dynamic statistical parametric mapping for analyzing ictal magnetoencephalographic spikes in patients with intractable frontal lobe epilepsy.

Authors:  Naoaki Tanaka; Andrew J Cole; Deidre von Pechmann; Daniel G Wakeman; Matti S Hämäläinen; Hesheng Liu; Joseph R Madsen; Blaise F Bourgeois; Steven M Stufflebeam
Journal:  Epilepsy Res       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 3.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.