Literature DB >> 16060321

A standard approach to measurement uncertainties for scientists and engineers in medicine.

K Gregory1, G Bibbo, J E Pattison.   

Abstract

The critical nature of health care demands high performance levels from medical equipment. To ensure these performance levels are maintained, medical physicists and biomedical engineers conduct a range of measurements on equipment during acceptance testing and on-going quality assurance programs. Wherever there are measurements, there are measurement uncertainties with potential conflicts between the measurements made by installers, owners and occasionally regulators. Prior to 1993, various methods were used to calculate and report measurement uncertainties. In 1993, the International Organization for Standardization published the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement (GUM). The document was jointly published with six international organizations principally involved in measurements and standards. The GUM is regarded as an international benchmark on how measurement uncertainty should be calculated and reported. Despite the critical nature of these measurements, there has not been widespread use of the GUM by medical physicists and biomedical engineers. This may be due to the complexity of the GUM. Some organisations have published guidance on the GUM tailored to specific measurement disciplines. This paper presents the philosophy behind the GUM, and demonstrates, with a medical physics measurement example, how the GUM recommends uncertainties be calculated and reported.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16060321     DOI: 10.1007/bf03178705

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Australas Phys Eng Sci Med        ISSN: 0158-9938            Impact factor:   1.430


  2 in total

1.  Enhancement of natural background gamma-radiation dose around uranium microparticles in the human body.

Authors:  John E Pattison; Richard P Hugtenburg; Stuart Green
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Evaluation of the ability of three commercially available dosimeters to detect systematic delivery errors in step-and-shoot IMRT plans.

Authors:  Alison Gray; Omemh Bawazeer; Sankar Arumugam; Philip Vial; Joseph Descallar; David Thwaites; Lois Holloway
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2021-09-30
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.