Literature DB >> 16059842

[An enquiry into the WILDE-Intelligence-Test (WIT): comparability of application of the paper-pencil-version vs. the computer based application -- an analysis based on data of the Leipzig Vocational Retraining Center].

A Bettinville1, H Rabenberg, K-D Hänsgen.   

Abstract

This report investigates the equivalence of the computerized version of the WILDE intelligence test (WIT) and its paper-and-pencil analog in a group of occupationally reorienting adults at the Leipzig Vocational Retraining Centre (Berufsförderungswerk Leipzig). In particular, the normative as well as the structural equivalence of the two test formats (paper-and-pencil vs. computer) were examined. The results indicate that both test formats are measuring the same construct, i. e., the two tests are structurally equivalent. Significant differences in mean for the total scores of most of the WIT subtests favour separate standardization of the computerized test format.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16059842     DOI: 10.1055/s-2005-866926

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rehabilitation (Stuttg)        ISSN: 0034-3536            Impact factor:   1.113


  3 in total

1.  Logistics of collecting patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in clinical practice: an overview and practical examples.

Authors:  Matthias Rose; Andrea Bezjak
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  The PROMIS of better outcome assessment: responsiveness, floor and ceiling effects, and Internet administration.

Authors:  James Fries; Matthias Rose; Eswar Krishnan
Journal:  J Rheumatol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 4.666

3.  Online assessment of ALS functional rating scale compares well to in-clinic evaluation: a prospective trial.

Authors:  André Maier; Teresa Holm; Paul Wicks; Laura Steinfurth; Peter Linke; Christoph Münch; Robert Meyer; Thomas Meyer
Journal:  Amyotroph Lateral Scler       Date:  2012-02
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.