Literature DB >> 16055269

Psychometric properties of the TSK-11: a shortened version of the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia.

Steve R Woby1, Neil K Roach, Martin Urmston, Paul J Watson.   

Abstract

The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK) is one of the most frequently employed measures for assessing pain-related fear in back pain patients. Despite its widespread use, there is relatively little data to support the psychometric properties of the English version of this scale. This study investigated the psychometric properties of the English version of the TSK in a sample of chronic low back pain patients. Item analysis revealed that four items possessed low item total correlations (4, 8, 12, 16) and four items had response trends that deviated from a pattern of normal distribution (4, 9, 12, 14). Consequently, we tested the psychometric properties of a shorter version of the TSK (TSK-11), having excluded the six psychometrically poor items. The psychometric properties of this measure were compared to those of the original TSK. Both measures demonstrated good internal consistency (TSK: alpha=0.76; TSK-11: alpha=0.79), test-retest reliability (TSK: ICC=0.82, SEM=3.16; TSK-11: ICC=0.81, SEM=2.54), responsiveness (TSK: SRM=-1.19; TSK-11: SRM=-1.11), concurrent validity and predictive validity. In respect of specific cut-off scores, a reduction of at least four points on both measures maximised the likelihood of correctly identifying an important reduction in fear of movement. Overall, the TSK-11 possessed similar psychometric properties to the original TSK and offered the advantage of brevity. Further research is warranted to investigate the utility of the new instrument and the cut-off scores in a wider group of chronic pain patients in different clinical settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16055269     DOI: 10.1016/j.pain.2005.05.029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain        ISSN: 0304-3959            Impact factor:   6.961


  192 in total

1.  Comparison of graded exercise and graded exposure clinical outcomes for patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Steven Z George; Virgil T Wittmer; Roger B Fillingim; Michael E Robinson
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 4.751

2.  Distressed, immobilized, or lacking employer support? A sub-classification of acute work-related low back pain.

Authors:  Silje Endresen Reme; William S Shaw; Ivan A Steenstra; Mary Jane Woiszwillo; Glenn Pransky; Steven J Linton
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-12

Review 3.  Prevention and Management of Post-operative Complications Following ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Brian J Eckenrode; James L Carey; Brian J Sennett; Miltiadis H Zgonis
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-09

4.  Greater fear of reinjury is related to stiffened jump-landing biomechanics and muscle activation in women after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Stephanie M Trigsted; Dane B Cook; Kristen A Pickett; Lisa Cadmus-Bertram; Warren R Dunn; David R Bell
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  The emotional coaching model: quantitative and qualitative research into relationships, communication and decisions in physical and sports rehabilitation.

Authors:  Stefano Respizzi; Elisabetta Covelli
Journal:  Joints       Date:  2016-01-31

6.  Kinesiophobia after anterior cruciate ligament rupture and reconstruction: noncopers versus potential copers.

Authors:  Erin H Hartigan; Andrew D Lynch; David S Logerstedt; Terese L Chmielewski; Lynn Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Pain sensitivity subgroups in individuals with spine pain: potential relevance to short-term clinical outcome.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Joel E Bialosky; Michael E Robinson; Steven Z George
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2014-04-24

Review 8.  Psychological predictors of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Joshua S Everhart; Thomas M Best; David C Flanigan
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  A SMART design to determine the optimal treatment of chronic pain among military personnel.

Authors:  Diane Flynn; Linda H Eaton; Dale J Langford; Nicholas Ieronimakis; Honor McQuinn; Richard O Burney; Samuel L Holmes; Ardith Z Doorenbos
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 2.226

10.  Experimental pain responses support peripheral and central sensitization in patients with unilateral shoulder pain.

Authors:  Rogelio A Coronado; Corey B Simon; Carolina Valencia; Steven Z George
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.442

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.