BACKGROUND: Discharge codes are frequently used to describe hospital activity related to heart failure (HF). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether discharge codes for HF underestimated or overestimated hospital activity related to HF. DESIGN: Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), who commonly have HF, were identified and their case notes reviewed to identify cases of HF missed by discharge codes. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted between November 1997 and January 1998 with either HF or AF. Identification of HF and AF by ICD10 hospital discharge codes. Identification of additional cases of AF from a central hospital-wide ECG database. RESULTS: We identified 330 cases with an ICD 10 code for HF, of which 43 (13%) were deemed to be miscoded, 32 patients (10%) were classified as possible, 39 (12%) as probable and 216 (65%) as definite HF. Results were similar whether or not HF was the primary discharge diagnosis. We identified 452 patients with AF, of whom 45 (10%) were classified as probable and 193 (43%) as definite HF. 129 (54%) of these cases had no diagnostic discharge code for HF. ICD 10 discharge codes for HF were correct in 77% of cases but identified only 66% of patients with probable or definite HF in this analysis. Screening of other diagnoses would have identified further cases of HF. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital discharge codes substantially underestimate hospital events related to HF in the UK.
BACKGROUND: Discharge codes are frequently used to describe hospital activity related to heart failure (HF). OBJECTIVES: To determine whether discharge codes for HF underestimated or overestimated hospital activity related to HF. DESIGN:Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), who commonly have HF, were identified and their case notes reviewed to identify cases of HF missed by discharge codes. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Patients admitted between November 1997 and January 1998 with either HF or AF. Identification of HF and AF by ICD10 hospital discharge codes. Identification of additional cases of AF from a central hospital-wide ECG database. RESULTS: We identified 330 cases with an ICD 10 code for HF, of which 43 (13%) were deemed to be miscoded, 32 patients (10%) were classified as possible, 39 (12%) as probable and 216 (65%) as definite HF. Results were similar whether or not HF was the primary discharge diagnosis. We identified 452 patients with AF, of whom 45 (10%) were classified as probable and 193 (43%) as definite HF. 129 (54%) of these cases had no diagnostic discharge code for HF. ICD 10 discharge codes for HF were correct in 77% of cases but identified only 66% of patients with probable or definite HF in this analysis. Screening of other diagnoses would have identified further cases of HF. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital discharge codes substantially underestimate hospital events related to HF in the UK.
Authors: Sunil K Agarwal; Lisa Wruck; Miguel Quibrera; Kunihiro Matsushita; Laura R Loehr; Patricia P Chang; Wayne D Rosamond; Jacqueline Wright; Gerardo Heiss; Josef Coresh Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Ricky Camplain; Anna Kucharska-Newton; Carmen C Cuthbertson; Jacqueline D Wright; Alvaro Alonso; Gerardo Heiss Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2017-01-25 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Christoph Ohlmeier; Rafael Mikolajczyk; Johann Frick; Franziska Prütz; Wilhelm Haverkamp; Edeltraut Garbe Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2015-03-17 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: A Pazin-Filho; A Kottgen; A G Bertoni; S D Russell; E Selvin; W D Rosamond; J Coresh Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Audrey H H Merry; Jolanda M A Boer; Leo J Schouten; Edith J M Feskens; W M Monique Verschuren; Anton P M Gorgels; Piet A van den Brandt Journal: Eur J Epidemiol Date: 2009-04-01 Impact factor: 8.082
Authors: Hannah Clark; Rezwanul Rana; Jeff Gow; Melissa Pearson; Tom van der Touw; Neil Smart Journal: Heart Fail Rev Date: 2021-03-25 Impact factor: 4.214