Literature DB >> 16054739

Carcinogenic risks of dioxin: mechanistic considerations.

Michael Schwarz1, Klaus E Appel.   

Abstract

Dioxins and dioxin-like chemicals demonstrate high affinity binding to the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR), a ligand activated transcription factor, which mediates most, if not all, of the toxic responses of these agents. Since dioxins are not directly genotoxic their carcinogenic effect is likely the result of their tumor promoting activity produced by activation of the AhR. For the purpose of risk assessment extrapolation from effects in the observable high dose range to background dietary exposure is necessary. In the present review, we discuss various aspects of low-dose-response of receptor-mediated processes in general, including threshold phenomena with regard to tumor promotion during multi-stage carcinogenesis. In this connection the reversibility of tumor promotion plays an important role but this may not be valid for dioxins due to their long half life. The relevance of cytochrome P 4501 A-induction as biomarker for prediction of carcinogenic effects of dioxins at low doses is considered. Dioxins may act in concert with endogenous ligands of the AhR, an effect which becomes particularly relevant at low toxicant concentrations. At present, however, the nature and role of these postulated ligands are unknown. Furthermore, it is unclear whether dioxins produce synergistic tumor promotional effects with non-dioxin-like chemicals to which humans are also exposed. Dioxins and, e.g., non-dioxin-like PCBs act through different receptors and there is, albeit yet limited, experimental evidence from experimental studies to suggest that they may act on different target cell populations within the same target organ. From the available data the existence of a (physiological) threshold of effects cannot be proven and may not even exist. For regulatory purposes the application of a so called "practical threshold" for the carcinogenic effect of dioxins is proposed. Further mechanistic studies should be conducted to get insight into the dose-response characteristics of relevant events of dioxin-like and non-dioxin-like agents and into the consequences of potential interactions between both group of compounds during carcinogenesis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16054739     DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2005.05.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol        ISSN: 0273-2300            Impact factor:   3.271


  11 in total

1.  Protective effects of coenzyme Q10 and resveratrol on oxidative stress induced by various dioxins on transheterozigot larvae of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Deniz Altun Çolak; Handan Uysal
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Biological and tumor-promoting effects of dioxin-like and non-dioxin-like polychlorinated biphenyls in mouse liver after single or combined treatment.

Authors:  Benjamin Rignall; Konstanze Grote; Alina Gavrilov; Marc Weimer; Annette Kopp-Schneider; Eberhard Krause; Klaus E Appel; Albrecht Buchmann; Larry W Robertson; Hans-Joachim Lehmler; Izabela Kania-Korwel; Ibrahim Chahoud; Michael Schwarz
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  The role of the dioxin-responsive element cluster between the Cyp1a1 and Cyp1a2 loci in aryl hydrocarbon receptor biology.

Authors:  Manabu Nukaya; Susan Moran; Christopher A Bradfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) in the regulation of cell-cell contact and tumor growth.

Authors:  Cornelia Dietrich; Bernd Kaina
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2010-01-27       Impact factor: 4.944

5.  RNAi-based screening identifies kinases interfering with dioxin-mediated up-regulation of CYP1A1 activity.

Authors:  David Gilot; Nolwenn Le Meur; Fanny Giudicelli; Marc Le Vée; Dominique Lagadic-Gossmann; Nathalie Théret; Olivier Fardel
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-03-29       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  TCDD and cancer: a critical review of epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Paolo Boffetta; Kenneth A Mundt; Hans-Olov Adami; Philip Cole; Jack S Mandel
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.635

7.  Body burdens of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins, dibenzofurans, and biphenyls and their relations to estrogen metabolism in pregnant women.

Authors:  Shu-Li Wang; Yu-Chen Chang; How-Ran Chao; Chien-Ming Li; Lih-Ann Li; Long-Yau Lin; Olaf Päpke
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Rationale for Environmental Hygiene towards global protection of fetuses and young children from adverse lifestyle factors.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Bourguignon; Anne-Simone Parent; Jos C S Kleinjans; Tim S Nawrot; Greet Schoeters; Nicolas Van Larebeke
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 5.984

9.  Exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin increases the activation of aryl hydrocarbon receptor and is associated with the aggressiveness of osteosarcoma MG-63 osteoblast-like cells.

Authors:  Shih-Chieh Yang; Chin-Hsien Wu; Yuan-Kun Tu; Shin-Yu Huang; Pai-Chien Chou
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 2.967

10.  Ranking cancer risks of organic hazardous air pollutants in the United States.

Authors:  Miranda M Loh; Jonathan I Levy; John D Spengler; E Andres Houseman; Deborah H Bennett
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 9.031

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.