Literature DB >> 16053438

An integrated service network in maternity--the implementation of a midwifery-led unit.

Sally K Tracy1, Donna Hartz, Michael Nicholl, Yvonne McCann, Deborah Latta.   

Abstract

Maternity services in Australia are in urgent need of change. During the last 10 years several reviews have highlighted the need to provide more continuity of care for women in conjunction with the rationalisation of services. One solution may lie in the development of new integrated systems of care where primary-level maternity units offer midwifery-led care and women are transferred into perinatal centres to access tertiary-level obstetric technology and staff when required. This case study outlines the introduction of caseload midwifery into an Area Health Service in metropolitan Sydney. Our objective is to explore the concept of caseload midwifery and the process of implementing the first midwifery-led unit in NSW within an integrated service network. The midwife-led unit is a small but growing phenomenon in many countries. However, the provision of "continuity" and "woman-centred" midwifery care involves radical changes to conventional hospital practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16053438     DOI: 10.1071/ah050332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust Health Rev        ISSN: 0156-5788            Impact factor:   1.990


  9 in total

1.  Exploring implementation and sustainability of models of care: can theory help?

Authors:  Della A Forster; Michelle Newton; Helen L McLachlan; Karen Willis
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.295

2.  A randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery care: M@NGO (Midwives @ New Group practice Options).

Authors:  Sally K Tracy; Donna Hartz; Bev Hall; Jyai Allen; Amanda Forti; Anne Lainchbury; Jan White; Alec Welsh; Mark Tracy; Sue Kildea
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Caseload midwifery as organisational change: the interplay between professional and organisational projects in Denmark.

Authors:  Viola Burau; Charlotte Overgaard
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  Birthplace in New South Wales, Australia: an analysis of perinatal outcomes using routinely collected data.

Authors:  Caroline S E Homer; Charlene Thornton; Vanessa L Scarf; David A Ellwood; Jeremy J N Oats; Maralyn J Foureur; David Sibbritt; Helen L McLachlan; Della A Forster; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  What women want: qualitative analysis of consumer evaluations of maternity care in Queensland, Australia.

Authors:  Loretta C McKinnon; Samantha J Prosser; Yvette D Miller
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Amy Monk; Mark Tracy; Maralyn Foureur; Celia Grigg; Sally Tracy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Comparing satisfaction and burnout between caseload and standard care midwives: findings from two cross-sectional surveys conducted in Victoria, Australia.

Authors:  Michelle S Newton; Helen L McLachlan; Karen F Willis; Della A Forster
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-12-24       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 8.  Implementation science in maternity care: a scoping review.

Authors:  Ann Dadich; Annika Piper; Dominiek Coates
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 7.327

9.  COSMOS: COmparing Standard Maternity care with one-to-one midwifery support: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Helen L McLachlan; Della A Forster; Mary-Ann Davey; Judith Lumley; Tanya Farrell; Jeremy Oats; Lisa Gold; Ulla Waldenström; Leah Albers; Mary Anne Biro
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 3.007

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.