Literature DB >> 16052301

Enoxaparin in clinical practice and clinical trials of non-ST-elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS).

Pranab Das1, David J Moliterno.   

Abstract

Non-ST elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome (NSTE-ACS) is a myocardial ischemic disorder frequently caused by coronary artery plaque rupture and partial or transient vessel occlusion. Platelets and thrombin play pivotal roles in formation and propagation of thrombus at the site of plaque disruption and embolization into the vascular bed. With the outgoing development of antithrombotic, antiplatelet, and mechanical therapies, the management of NSTE-ACS is constantly evolving. Heparins are the cornerstone of antithrombotic therapy in the current management of NSTE-ACS. Unfractionated heparin and fractionated heparins like enoxaparin have been studied in several large clinical trials and found to be effective in reducing death and myocardial infarction rates. For medical management alone or primarily (conservative strategy), enoxaparin has been shown to be superior to unfractionated heparin. With an early invasive strategy providing better clinical outcome compared to a conservative strategy, the paradigm of ACS management has shifted in favor of early (within 48 hours of admission) cardiac catheterization. The effectiveness of enoxaparin compared to unfractionated heparin is now being re-considered in the era of poly-pharmacotherapy and an early invasive strategy for ACS management. We review the role of enoxaparin in the contemporary treatment of NSTE-ACS utilizing recent clinical trial data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16052301     DOI: 10.1007/s11239-005-1851-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis        ISSN: 0929-5305            Impact factor:   2.300


  32 in total

Review 1.  Low-molecular-weight heparins.

Authors:  J I Weitz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-09-04       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing, monitoring, efficacy, and safety.

Authors:  J Hirsh; T E Warkentin; S G Shaughnessy; S S Anand; J L Halperin; R Raschke; C Granger; E M Ohman; J E Dalen
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  Comparison of early invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable coronary syndromes treated with the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor tirofiban.

Authors:  C P Cannon; W S Weintraub; L A Demopoulos; R Vicari; M J Frey; N Lakkis; F J Neumann; D H Robertson; P T DeLucca; P M DiBattiste; C M Gibson; E Braunwald
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-06-21       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Combination enoxaparin and abciximab therapy during percutaneous coronary intervention: "NICE guys finish first".

Authors:  D J Kereiakes; E Fry; W Matthai; A Niederman; L Barr; B Brodie; J Zidar; P Casale; G Christy; D Moliterno; R Lengerich; T Broderick; T Shimshak; M Cohen
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.022

5.  Closure devices and vascular complications among percutaneous coronary intervention patients receiving enoxaparin, glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and clopidogrel.

Authors:  J Emilio Exaire; James E Tcheng; Dean J Kereiakes; Neal S Kleiman; Robert J Applegate; David J Moliterno
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Assessment of the treatment effect of enoxaparin for unstable angina/non-Q-wave myocardial infarction. TIMI 11B-ESSENCE meta-analysis.

Authors:  E M Antman; M Cohen; D Radley; C McCabe; J Rush; J Premmereur; E Braunwald
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1999-10-12       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Enoxaparin and abciximab adjunctive pharmacotherapy during percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  D J Kereiakes; C Grines; E Fry; P Esente; D Hoppensteadt; M Midei; L Barr; W Matthai; M Todd; T Broderick; R Rubinstein; J Fareed; E Santoian; A Neiderman; B Brodie; J Zidar; J J Ferguson; M Cohen
Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.022

8.  Enoxaparin versus unfractionated heparin in patients treated with tirofiban, aspirin and an early conservative initial management strategy: results from the A phase of the A-to-Z trial.

Authors:  James A de Lemos; Michael A Blazing; Stephen D Wiviott; William E Brady; Harvey D White; Keith A A Fox; Joanne Palmisano; Karen E Ramsey; David W Bilheimer; Eldrin F Lewis; M Pfeffer; Robert M Califf; Eugene Braunwald
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 9.  Efficacy and bleeding complications among patients randomized to enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin for antithrombin therapy in non-ST-Segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: a systematic overview.

Authors:  John L Petersen; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Vic Hasselblad; Elliott M Antman; Marc Cohen; Shaun G Goodman; Anatoly Langer; Michael A Blazing; Anne Le-Moigne-Amrani; James A de Lemos; Christopher C Nessel; Robert A Harrington; James J Ferguson; Eugene Braunwald; Robert M Califf
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Enoxaparin vs unfractionated heparin in high-risk patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes managed with an intended early invasive strategy: primary results of the SYNERGY randomized trial.

Authors:  James J Ferguson; Robert M Califf; Elliott M Antman; Marc Cohen; Cindy L Grines; Shaun Goodman; Dean J Kereiakes; Anatoly Langer; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Christopher C Nessel; Paul W Armstrong; Alvaro Avezum; Phil Aylward; Richard C Becker; Luigi Biasucci; Steven Borzak; Jacques Col; Marty J Frey; Ed Fry; Dietrich C Gulba; Sema Guneri; Enrique Gurfinkel; Robert Harrington; Judith S Hochman; Neal S Kleiman; Martin B Leon; Jose Luis Lopez-Sendon; Carl J Pepine; Witold Ruzyllo; Steven R Steinhubl; Paul S Teirstein; Luis Toro-Figueroa; Harvey White
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2004-07-07       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.