Literature DB >> 16052104

Efficacy and safety of heparinase I versus protamine in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting with and without cardiopulmonary bypass.

Mark Stafford-Smith1, Edward A Lefrak, Anjum G Qazi, Ian J Welsby, Linda Barber, Andreas Hoeft, Alejandro Dorenbaum, Jasmine Mathias, James J Rochon, Mark F Newman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hemodynamic protamine reactions with heparin reversal during cardiac surgery are common and associated with adverse outcomes. As an alternative to protamine, the authors examined heparinase I reversal of heparin after aortocoronary bypass graft surgery.
METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial, 167 on- and off-pump aortocoronary bypass graft surgery patients received either heparinase I (maximum 35 microg/kg) or protamine (maximum 650 mg) for heparin reversal, monitored by activated clotting time values and clinical assessment. Hemodynamic parameters were recorded electronically; safety evaluation was to 30 days postoperatively. Noninferiority was predefined as 400 ml or less median 12-h chest tube drainage from intensive care unit arrival for heparinase I patients, after risk adjustment. Hemodynamic instability was defined as systemic hypotension (> or = 30 mmHg decrease) and/or pulmonary hypertension (> or = 40 mmHg with an increase > or = 10 mmHg) within 30 min of heparin reversal initiation.
RESULTS: Patient enrollment was terminated on advisement of the Data Safety Monitoring Board. Although heparinase I was noninferior for 12-h chest tube drainage, protamine had a superior safety profile. Overall, heparinase I subjects had longer hospital stays (P = 0.04), were more likely to experience a serious adverse event (P = 0.01), and were less likely to avoid transfusion (P = 0.006). A composite morbidity score was not different (P = 0.24), and similar rates of hemodynamic instability were observed between groups. Findings were consistent in analyses stratified by on- and off-pump surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: Heparinase I reverses heparin anticoagulation after aortocoronary bypass graft surgery but is not equivalent to protamine because of its inferior safety profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16052104     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-200508000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  10 in total

Review 1.  Approaches to prevent bleeding associated with anticoagulants: current status and recent developments.

Authors:  Manu Thomas Kalathottukaren; Charles A Haynes; Jayachandran N Kizhakkedathu
Journal:  Drug Deliv Transl Res       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 4.617

2.  Heparin-like effect resistant to protamine in a child with haemorrhagic shock. Do we need heparinase?

Authors:  Mirco Nacoti; Diego Cantù; Daniele Bonacina; Federico Lussana; Ezio Bonanomi; Marina Marchetti; Anna Falanga
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 3.  Guideline for Reversal of Antithrombotics in Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals from the Neurocritical Care Society and Society of Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  Jennifer A Frontera; John J Lewin; Alejandro A Rabinstein; Imo P Aisiku; Anne W Alexandrov; Aaron M Cook; Gregory J del Zoppo; Monisha A Kumar; Ellinor I B Peerschke; Michael F Stiefel; Jeanne S Teitelbaum; Katja E Wartenberg; Cindy L Zerfoss
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.210

4.  Departures from the protocol during conduct of a clinical trial: a pattern from the data record consistent with a learning curve.

Authors:  J M Taekman; M Stafford-Smith; E J Velazquez; M C Wright; B G Phillips-Bute; M A Pfeffer; M A Sellers; K S Pieper; M F Newman; F Van de Werf; R Diaz; J Leimberger; R M Califf
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2010-08-10

Review 5.  Degradation of the endothelial glycocalyx in clinical settings: searching for the sheddases.

Authors:  Bernhard F Becker; Matthias Jacob; Stephanie Leipert; Andrew H J Salmon; Daniel Chappell
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-05-22       Impact factor: 4.335

6.  STS/SCA/AmSECT Clinical Practice Guidelines: Anticoagulation during Cardiopulmonary Bypass.

Authors:  Linda Shore-Lesserson; Robert A Baker; Victor Ferraris; Philip E Greilich; David Fitzgerald; Philip Roman; John Hammon
Journal:  J Extra Corpor Technol       Date:  2018-03

7.  Pulmonary hypertension in cardiac surgery.

Authors:  André Denault; Alain Deschamps; Jean-Claude Tardif; Jean Lambert; Louis Perrault
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2010-02

8.  Inactivation of heparin by cationically modified chitosan.

Authors:  Barbara Lorkowska-Zawicka; Kamil Kamiński; Justyna Ciejka; Krzysztof Szczubiałka; Magdalena Białas; Krzysztof Okoń; Dariusz Adamek; Maria Nowakowska; Jacek Jawień; Rafał Olszanecki; Ryszard Korbut
Journal:  Mar Drugs       Date:  2014-06-30       Impact factor: 5.118

9.  Nonclinical evaluation of novel cationically modified polysaccharide antidotes for unfractionated heparin.

Authors:  Bartlomiej Kalaska; Kamil Kaminski; Emilia Sokolowska; Dominik Czaplicki; Monika Kujdowicz; Krystyna Stalinska; Joanna Bereta; Krzysztof Szczubialka; Dariusz Pawlak; Maria Nowakowska; Andrzej Mogielnicki
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Toxicokinetic Profile of Dex40-GTMAC3-a Novel Polysaccharide Candidate for Reversal of Unfractionated Heparin.

Authors:  Emilia Sokolowska; Bartlomiej Kalaska; Kamil Kaminski; Alicja Lewandowska; Agnieszka Blazejczyk; Joanna Wietrzyk; Irena Kasacka; Krzysztof Szczubialka; Dariusz Pawlak; Maria Nowakowska; Andrzej Mogielnicki
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2016-03-17       Impact factor: 5.810

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.