Literature DB >> 16051464

Development of an auditory-perceptual rating instrument for the operatic singing voice.

Jennifer M Oates1, Belinda Bain, Pamela Davis, Janice Chapman, Dianna Kenny.   

Abstract

Although considerable progress has been made in the development of acoustic and physiological measures of operatic singing voice, there is still no widely accepted objective tool for the evaluation of its multidimensional features. Auditory-perceptual evaluation, therefore, remains an important evaluation method for singing pedagogues, voice scientists, and clinicians who work with opera singers. Few investigators, however, have attempted to develop standard auditory-perceptual tools for evaluation of the operatic voice. This study aimed to pilot test a new auditory-perceptual rating instrument for operatic singing voice. Nine expert teachers of operatic singing used the instrument to rate the singing voices of 21 professional opera chorus artists from a national opera company. The findings showed that the instrument has good face validity, that it can be legitimately treated as a psychometrically sound scale, and that raters can use the scale consistently, both between and within judges. This new instrument, therefore, has the potential to allow opera singers, their teachers, voice care clinicians, and researchers to evaluate the important auditory-perceptual features of operatic voice quality.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16051464     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2005.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  1 in total

1.  The subjective relevance of perceived sound aspects in remote singing education.

Authors:  Jan Otčenášek; Marek Frič; Eva Dvořáková; Zdeněk Otčenášek; Sven Ubik
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.