BACKGROUND: Gender differences in inpatient quality of care are well known. However, whether men and women receive equivalent ambulatory care is less well understood. OBJECTIVE: To study gender differences in quality of care for patients receiving primary care in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System. DESIGN: Cross-sectional samples of VA enrollees during fiscal years 1999 to 2000. PARTICIPANTS: Samples of 6,442 to 86,405 men and women treated at VA facilities for whom at least 1 of 9 quality measures was available. MEASUREMENTS: Appropriate general preventive services (pneumococcal vaccination, influenza vaccination, colorectal cancer screening), and specific services for diabetes (annual hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] testing, good glycemic control, annual diabetic eye exam), hypertension (good blood pressure control), or prior myocardial infarction (use of beta-blockers or aspirin). RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, there were no substantial gender differences in rates of appropriate care. For women compared with men, the adjusted relative risk for appropriate care ranged from 0.96 for blood pressure control (95% confidence interval: 0.93 to 0.99; P=.02) to 1.05 for HbA1c< or =8.0% (95% confidence interval: 1.03 to 1.07; P<.01). Analyses stratified by age demonstrated equivalent care between men and women in 9 of the 14 subgroups evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: In this large national health care system that predominantly serves men, the quality of ambulatory care is equivalent for women and men on numerous measures.
BACKGROUND: Gender differences in inpatient quality of care are well known. However, whether men and women receive equivalent ambulatory care is less well understood. OBJECTIVE: To study gender differences in quality of care for patients receiving primary care in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System. DESIGN: Cross-sectional samples of VA enrollees during fiscal years 1999 to 2000. PARTICIPANTS: Samples of 6,442 to 86,405 men and women treated at VA facilities for whom at least 1 of 9 quality measures was available. MEASUREMENTS: Appropriate general preventive services (pneumococcal vaccination, influenza vaccination, colorectal cancer screening), and specific services for diabetes (annual hemoglobin A1c [HbA1c] testing, good glycemic control, annual diabetic eye exam), hypertension (good blood pressure control), or prior myocardial infarction (use of beta-blockers or aspirin). RESULTS: In adjusted analyses, there were no substantial gender differences in rates of appropriate care. For women compared with men, the adjusted relative risk for appropriate care ranged from 0.96 for blood pressure control (95% confidence interval: 0.93 to 0.99; P=.02) to 1.05 for HbA1c< or =8.0% (95% confidence interval: 1.03 to 1.07; P<.01). Analyses stratified by age demonstrated equivalent care between men and women in 9 of the 14 subgroups evaluated. CONCLUSIONS: In this large national health care system that predominantly serves men, the quality of ambulatory care is equivalent for women and men on numerous measures.
Authors: S S Rathore; A K Berger; K P Weinfurt; M Feinleib; W J Oetgen; B J Gersh; K A Schulman Journal: Circulation Date: 2000-08-08 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jinan B Saaddine; Michael M Engelgau; Gloria L Beckles; Edward W Gregg; Theodore J Thompson; K M Venkat Narayan Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-04-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Michael P Pignone; Bradley N Gaynes; Jerry L Rushton; Catherine Mills Burchell; C Tracy Orleans; Cynthia D Mulrow; Kathleen N Lohr Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-05-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: J G Canto; J J Allison; C I Kiefe; C Fincher; R Farmer; P Sekar; S Person; N W Weissman Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2000-04-13 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Michael Pignone; Melissa Rich; Steven M Teutsch; Alfred O Berg; Kathleen N Lohr Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-07-16 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Salomeh Keyhani; Joseph S Ross; Paul Hebert; Cornelia Dellenbaugh; Joan D Penrod; Albert L Siu Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2007-10-30 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Lori Bastian; Mark Trentalange; Terrence E Murphy; Melissa Skanderson; Heather Allore; Evelyn Reyes-Harvey; Natalya C Maisel; Vera Gaetano; Steven Wright; Sally Haskell; Cynthia Brandt Journal: Med Care Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Elizabeth M Yano; Maria K Mor; Nichole K Bayliss; Xiangyan Xu; Michael J Fine Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2009-06-08 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Simone Dahrouge; William Hogg; Meltem Tuna; Grant Russell; Rose Anne Devlin; Peter Tugwell; Elisabeth Kristjansson Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2010-03-23 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Arun K Thukkani; Kush Agrawal; Lillian Prince; Kyle J Smoot; Alyssa B Dufour; Kelly Cho; David R Gagnon; Galina Sokolovskaya; Samantha Ly; Sara Temiyasathit; David P Faxon; J Michael Gaziano; Scott Kinlay Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2015-09-08 Impact factor: 24.094