Literature DB >> 16050574

Effects of dose and particle size on activated carbon treatment to sequester polychlorinated biphenyls and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in marine sediments.

John R Zimmerman1, David Werner, Upal Ghosh, Rod N Millward, Todd S Bridges, Richard G Luthy.   

Abstract

Recent laboratory studies show that mixing activated carbon with contaminated sediment reduces the chemical and biological availability of hydrophobic organic contaminants. In this study, we test the effects of varying the activated carbon dose and particle size in reducing the aqueous availability of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and the uptake of PCBs by two benthic organisms. We mixed PCB- and PAH-contaminated sediment from Hunters Point Naval Shipyard, San Francisco Bay (CA, USA), for one month with activated carbon, at doses of 0.34, 1.7, and 3.4% dry mass basis. We found that increasing the carbon dose increased the effectiveness in reducing PCB bioaccumulation. In 56-d uptake tests with the benthic organisms Neanthes arenaceodentata and Leptocheirus plumulosus, PCB bioaccumulation was reduced by 93 and 90%, respectively, with 3.4% carbon. Increasing the dose also increased the effectiveness in reducing PCB and PAH aqueous concentrations and uptake by semipermeable membrane devices and quiescent flux of PCBs to overlying water. Decreasing activated carbon particle size increased treatment effectiveness in reducing PCB aqueous concentration, and larger-sized activated carbon (400-1,700 microm) was ineffective with a contact period of one month. We invoke a numerical model based on intraparticle diffusion in sediment and activated carbon particles to help interpret our experimental results. This model was useful in explaining the trends for the effect of activated carbon dose and particle size on PCB aqueous concentrations in well-mixed systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16050574     DOI: 10.1897/04-368r.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem        ISSN: 0730-7268            Impact factor:   3.742


  12 in total

Review 1.  Active capping technology: a new environmental remediation of contaminated sediment.

Authors:  Chang Zhang; Meng-Ying Zhu; Guang-Ming Zeng; Zhi-Gang Yu; Fang Cui; Zhong-Zhu Yang; Liu-Qing Shen
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Activated carbon as a means of limiting bioaccumulation of organochlorine pesticides, triclosan, triclocarban, and fipronil from sediments rich in organic matter.

Authors:  Viet D Dang; Kevin J Kroll; Samuel D Supowit; Rolf U Halden; Nancy D Denslow
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 7.086

Review 3.  In situ remediation of contaminated marinesediment: an overview.

Authors:  G Lofrano; G Libralato; D Minetto; S De Gisi; F Todaro; B Conte; D Calabrò; L Quatraro; M Notarnicola
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2016-12-24       Impact factor: 4.223

4.  Dehalogenation of polybrominated diphenyl ethers and polychlorinated biphenyl by bimetallic, impregnated, and nanoscale zerovalent iron.

Authors:  Yuan Zhuang; Sungwoo Ahn; Angelia L Seyfferth; Yoko Masue-Slowey; Scott Fendorf; Richard G Luthy
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-05-10       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Sequestration of HCHs and DDTs in sediments in Dongting Lake of China with multiwalled carbon nanotubes: implication for in situ sequestration.

Authors:  Yanyan Guo; Cui Lai; Guangming Zeng; Jilai Gong; Chang Su; Chunping Yang; Piao Xu
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-01-26       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  In-situ sorbent amendments: a new direction in contaminated sediment management.

Authors:  Upal Ghosh; Richard G Luthy; Gerard Cornelissen; David Werner; Charles A Menzie
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 7.  In situ sediment treatment using activated carbon: a demonstrated sediment cleanup technology.

Authors:  Clayton R Patmont; Upal Ghosh; Paul LaRosa; Charles A Menzie; Richard G Luthy; Marc S Greenberg; Gerard Cornelissen; Espen Eek; John Collins; John Hull; Tore Hjartland; Edward Glaza; John Bleiler; James Quadrini
Journal:  Integr Environ Assess Manag       Date:  2015-01-06       Impact factor: 2.992

8.  Evaluation of strategies to minimize ecotoxic side-effects of sorbent-based sediment remediation.

Authors:  Zhantao Han; Sebastian Abel; Jarkko Akkanen; David Werner
Journal:  J Chem Technol Biotechnol       Date:  2017-03-06       Impact factor: 3.174

9.  Response of marine benthic fauna to thin-layer capping with activated carbon in a large-scale field experiment in the Grenland fjords, Norway.

Authors:  Göran S Samuelsson; Caroline Raymond; Stefan Agrenius; Morten Schaanning; Gerard Cornelissen; Jonas S Gunnarsson
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2017-04-18       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 10.  Polychlorinated biphenyl sorption and availability in field-contaminated sediments.

Authors:  David Werner; Sarah E Hale; Upal Ghosh; Richard G Luthy
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 9.028

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.