Literature DB >> 16050538

Experience of pain and analgesia with water and land births.

Jakob Eberhard1, Sonja Stein, Verena Geissbuehler.   

Abstract

Labor is one of the most painful experiences in a woman's life. Does water birth influence the pain experienced? Data from an ongoing, longitudinal, prospective observational study that spans 9 years and includes questionnaires from 12,040 births were used to evaluate pain perception (visual analogue scale (VAS)) and analgesic use. Three birthing methods were compared: water birth, bed birth and Maia stool birth. Based on the VAS, the data show that the different birthing methods do not influence the intensity of pain throughout the different stages of labor. The only significant difference noted was that bed births are more painful in the early first stage, and less painful at the end of the second stage. This later difference may be due to increased use of epidural anesthesia in women choosing a bed birth. Women who choose bed births are significantly less likely than others to have an analgesic-free birth. For primiparas, there is also a small but significant difference showing that water births are less likely to require analgesics compared to Maia stool births. No such difference is seen in women who have given birth previously. We conclude that women who choose bed births perceive more pain in the early first stage of labor, leading them to be more likely to choose an epidural anesthesia in the late first stage, or to use other types of analgesics. Women who choose water births or Maia stool births are more likely to get through labor without using any analgesics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16050538     DOI: 10.1080/01443610400023080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0167-482X            Impact factor:   2.949


  4 in total

1.  Factors influencing the use of birth pools in the United Kingdom: Perspectives of women, midwives and medical staff.

Authors:  Sarah Milosevic; Sue Channon; Billie Hunter; Mary Nolan; Jacqueline Hughes; Christian Barlow; Rebecca Milton; Julia Sanders
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  2019-10-05       Impact factor: 2.372

2.  Factors influencing water immersion during labour: qualitative case studies of six maternity units in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  Sarah Milosevic; Susan Channon; Jacqueline Hughes; Billie Hunter; Mary Nolan; Rebecca Milton; Julia Sanders
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 3.007

3.  Comparative Efficacy of Water and Conventional Delivery during Labour: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Guanran Zhang; Qiuhong Yang
Journal:  J Healthc Eng       Date:  2022-03-29       Impact factor: 2.682

4.  A comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes between water immersion during labor and conventional labor and delivery.

Authors:  Yinglin Liu; Yukun Liu; Xiuzhi Huang; Chuying Du; Jing Peng; Peixian Huang; Jianping Zhang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.007

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.