Literature DB >> 16049812

Colorectal cancer screening behavior and health insurance status (United States).

B Alex Matthews1, Ruric C Anderson, Ann B Nattinger.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between health insurance status and CRC screening behavior among a diverse sample of ambulatory patients.
METHODS: Cross-sectional, retrospective study. Quota sampling techniques were used to recruit 52 insured/uninsured patients > or =age 50 from three Midwestern medical clinics (N=104). Data were collected by interviewer-administered CRC screening questionnaires.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent of the sample was in compliance with CRC testing guidelines. Insured compared to uninsured participants were significantly more likely to have ever completed any testing (77% versus 33%), and were more likely to have undertaken testing according to current US guidelines (62% versus 17%), all ps < 0.001. Insured participants also were significantly more likely than the uninsured to know about, receive physician recommendation to screen, and profess future intent to screen, ps < 0.001. Fewer uninsured participants were tested for routine reasons compared to insured participants. Significant group differences did not emerge on future preference for a particular screening methodology, if testing costs were equal.
CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that CRC screening depends, in part, on health insurance status. Increasing insurance coverage or resources for low-cost, accurate tests may facilitate future screening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16049812     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-005-1228-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  22 in total

1.  Finding medical care for colorectal cancer symptoms: experiences among those facing financial barriers.

Authors:  Maria D Thomson; Laura A Siminoff
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2014-11-12

2.  Colorectal cancer screening perceptions and practices: results from a national survey of gastroenterology, surgery and radiology trainees.

Authors:  Amy S Oxentenko; Robert A Vierkant; Darrell S Pardi; David R Farley; Eric J Dozois; Thomas E Hartman; David M Hough; Wesley O Petersen; Carrie N Klabunde; Katherine Sharpe; John H Bond; Robert A Smith; Bernard Levin; John B Pope; Paul C Schroy; Paul J Limburg
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Underuse of colorectal cancer screening among men screened for prostate cancer: a teachable moment?

Authors:  Sara N Red; Elisabeth C Kassan; Randi M Williams; Sofiya Penek; John Lynch; Chiledum Ahaghotu; Kathryn L Taylor
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Self-reported barriers to colorectal cancer screening in a racially diverse, low-income study population.

Authors:  Benjamin W Quick; Christina M Hester; Kristin L Young; K Allen Greiner
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-04

5.  The utility of non-proportional quota sampling for recruiting at-risk women for microbicide research.

Authors:  Kathleen M Morrow; Sara Vargas; Rochelle K Rosen; Anna L Christensen; Liz Salomon; Lawrence Shulman; Candelaria Barroso; Joseph L Fava
Journal:  AIDS Behav       Date:  2007-02-27

6.  Rural-Urban Differences in Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers in Nebraska.

Authors:  Alejandro G Hughes; Shinobu Watanabe-Galloway; Paulette Schnell; Amr S Soliman
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2015-12

7.  Colorectal cancer screening among users of county health centers and users of private physician practices.

Authors:  Catherine R Messina; Dorothy S Lane; Roberto C Colson
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.792

8.  Improving colorectal cancer screening by using community volunteers: results of the Carolinas cancer education and screening (CARES) project.

Authors:  Mira L Katz; Cathy Tatum; Stephanie L Dickinson; David M Murray; Kristie Long-Foley; M Robert Cooper; Morgan Daven; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2007-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Racial differences in colorectal cancer screening practices and knowledge within a low-income population.

Authors:  Ann Scheck McAlearney; Katherine W Reeves; Stephanie L Dickinson; Kimberly M Kelly; Cathy Tatum; Mira L Katz; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  A comparison of colorectal cancer screening uptake among average-risk insured American Indian/Alaska Native and white women.

Authors:  David G Perdue; Jessica Chubak; Andy Bogart; Denise A Dillard; Eva Marie Garroutte; Dedra Buchwald
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2013-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.