B Alex Matthews1, Ruric C Anderson, Ann B Nattinger. 1. Medical College of Wisconsin, Health Policy Institute, Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Suite H2755, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, PO Box 26509, Milwaukee, WI 53226-0509, USA. amatthew@mcw.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between health insurance status and CRC screening behavior among a diverse sample of ambulatory patients. METHODS: Cross-sectional, retrospective study. Quota sampling techniques were used to recruit 52 insured/uninsured patients > or =age 50 from three Midwestern medical clinics (N=104). Data were collected by interviewer-administered CRC screening questionnaires. RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent of the sample was in compliance with CRC testing guidelines. Insured compared to uninsured participants were significantly more likely to have ever completed any testing (77% versus 33%), and were more likely to have undertaken testing according to current US guidelines (62% versus 17%), all ps < 0.001. Insured participants also were significantly more likely than the uninsured to know about, receive physician recommendation to screen, and profess future intent to screen, ps < 0.001. Fewer uninsured participants were tested for routine reasons compared to insured participants. Significant group differences did not emerge on future preference for a particular screening methodology, if testing costs were equal. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that CRC screening depends, in part, on health insurance status. Increasing insurance coverage or resources for low-cost, accurate tests may facilitate future screening.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the association between health insurance status and CRC screening behavior among a diverse sample of ambulatory patients. METHODS: Cross-sectional, retrospective study. Quota sampling techniques were used to recruit 52 insured/uninsured patients > or =age 50 from three Midwestern medical clinics (N=104). Data were collected by interviewer-administered CRC screening questionnaires. RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent of the sample was in compliance with CRC testing guidelines. Insured compared to uninsured participants were significantly more likely to have ever completed any testing (77% versus 33%), and were more likely to have undertaken testing according to current US guidelines (62% versus 17%), all ps < 0.001. Insured participants also were significantly more likely than the uninsured to know about, receive physician recommendation to screen, and profess future intent to screen, ps < 0.001. Fewer uninsured participants were tested for routine reasons compared to insured participants. Significant group differences did not emerge on future preference for a particular screening methodology, if testing costs were equal. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that CRC screening depends, in part, on health insurance status. Increasing insurance coverage or resources for low-cost, accurate tests may facilitate future screening.
Authors: Amy S Oxentenko; Robert A Vierkant; Darrell S Pardi; David R Farley; Eric J Dozois; Thomas E Hartman; David M Hough; Wesley O Petersen; Carrie N Klabunde; Katherine Sharpe; John H Bond; Robert A Smith; Bernard Levin; John B Pope; Paul C Schroy; Paul J Limburg Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2007 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Sara N Red; Elisabeth C Kassan; Randi M Williams; Sofiya Penek; John Lynch; Chiledum Ahaghotu; Kathryn L Taylor Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kathleen M Morrow; Sara Vargas; Rochelle K Rosen; Anna L Christensen; Liz Salomon; Lawrence Shulman; Candelaria Barroso; Joseph L Fava Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2007-02-27
Authors: Mira L Katz; Cathy Tatum; Stephanie L Dickinson; David M Murray; Kristie Long-Foley; M Robert Cooper; Morgan Daven; Electra D Paskett Journal: Cancer Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Ann Scheck McAlearney; Katherine W Reeves; Stephanie L Dickinson; Kimberly M Kelly; Cathy Tatum; Mira L Katz; Electra D Paskett Journal: Cancer Date: 2008-01-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: David G Perdue; Jessica Chubak; Andy Bogart; Denise A Dillard; Eva Marie Garroutte; Dedra Buchwald Journal: J Health Care Poor Underserved Date: 2013-08