Literature DB >> 16049731

Again, what the philosophy of biology is not.

Werner Callebaut1.   

Abstract

There are many things that philosophy of biology might be. But, given the existence of a professional philosophy of biology that is arguably a progressive research program and, as such, unrivaled, it makes sense to define philosophy of biology more narrowly than the totality of intersecting concerns biologists and philosophers (let alone other scholars) might have. The reasons for the success of the "new" philosophy of biology remain poorly understood. I reflect on what Dutch and Flemish, and, more generally, European philosophers of biology could do to improve the situation of their discipline locally, regionally, and internationally, paying particular attention to the lessons to be learned from the "Science Wars."

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16049731     DOI: 10.1007/s10441-005-5352-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Biotheor        ISSN: 0001-5342            Impact factor:   1.774


  1 in total

1.  Rethinking Woodger's Legacy in the Philosophy of Biology.

Authors:  Daniel J Nicholson; Richard Gawne
Journal:  J Hist Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.326

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.