Literature DB >> 16049392

Framing health messages based on anomalies in time preference.

Monica Ortendahl1, James F Fries.   

Abstract

Time discounting processes and their effects are increasingly taken into account in health-related decisions. Because these effects have a potentially large impact the characteristics of discounting should also be taken into consideration when framing health messages. Research on the relationship between time and health is discussed with a special focus on discounting biases. The criteria for selection of articles were potential practical application when formulating health messages. Time discounting processes vary with individuals and contexts. Therefore, no single model is expected to describe discounting processes completely. Discounting biases appear more prevalent in health decisions than in economic decisions, even when health and monetary outcomes are matched for utility. Research on decision-making under conditions of uncertainty has documented numerous anomalies of expected utility. Analysis on the anomalies related to intertemporal choice and discounted utility (DU) include the magnitude effect, dynamic inconsistency effect, instant endowment, status quo bias, and sequence effect. Discounting biases in the formulation of preventive health messages are important. The desire for behavioral change in these programs would benefit from considering the psychological factor of discounting. Framing health messages in terms of large, important outcomes or long delays should induce lower implicit discount rates. Framing health messages as losses rather than gains, or as involving a series of outcomes rather than individual outcomes, might similarly lower the implicit discount rate used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16049392

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


  6 in total

1.  Risk in public health and clinical work.

Authors:  M Ortendahl
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  A focus group study on breast cancer risk presentation: one format does not fit all.

Authors:  Michel Dorval; Karine Bouchard; Jocelyne Chiquette; Gord Glendon; Christine M Maugard; Wilhelm Dubuisson; Seema Panchal; Jacques Simard
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Consideration of future consequences and self-control mediate the impact of time perspectives on self-rated health and engagement in healthy lifestyles among young adults.

Authors:  Mengxi Guo; Yiling Lou; Ning Zhang
Journal:  Curr Psychol       Date:  2022-04-25

4.  The subjective value of delayed and probabilistic outcomes: Outcome size matters for gains but not for losses.

Authors:  Suzanne H Mitchell; Vanessa B Wilson
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 1.777

5.  Life satisfaction in patients with long-term non-malignant pain - relating LiSat-11 to the Multidimensional Pain Inventory (MPI).

Authors:  Annika J Silvemark; Håkan Källmén; Kamilla Portala; Carl Molander
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 3.186

6.  Shared decision-making based on different features of risk in the context of diabetes mellitus and rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Monica Ortendahl
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 2.423

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.