Literature DB >> 16048152

Midazolam premedication in children: a pilot study comparing intramuscular and intranasal administration.

Christy Lam1, Richard D Udin, Stanley F Malamed, David L Good, Jane L Forrest.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of intramuscular and intranasal midazolam used as a premedication before intravenous conscious sedation. Twenty-three children who were scheduled to receive dental treatment under intravenous sedation participated. The patients ranged in age from 2 to 9 years (mean age, 5.13 years) and were randomly assigned to receive a dose of 0.2 mg/kg of midazolam premedication via either intramuscular or intranasal administration. All patients received 50% nitrous oxide and 50% oxygen inhalation sedation and local anesthetic (0.2 mL of 4% prilocaine hydrochloride) before venipuncture. The sedation level, movement, and crying were evaluated at the following time points: 10 minutes after drug administration and at the times of parental separation, passive papoose board restraint, nitrous oxide nasal hood placement, local anesthetic administration, and initial venipuncture attempt. Mean ratings for the behavioral parameters of sedation level, degree of movement, and degree of crying were consistently higher but not significant in the intramuscular midazolam group at all 6 assessment points. Intramuscular midazolam was found to be statistically more effective in providing a better sedation level and less movement at the time of venipuncture than intranasal administration. Our findings indicate a tendency for intramuscular midazolam to be more effective as a premedication before intravenous sedation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16048152      PMCID: PMC2527044          DOI: 10.2344/0003-3006(2005)52[56:MPICAP]2.0.CO;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Prog        ISSN: 0003-3006


  13 in total

1.  [Comparison of intramuscular and intranasal premedication with midazolam in children].

Authors:  P de Santos; E Chabás; R Valero; M A Nalda
Journal:  Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim       Date:  1991 Jan-Feb

2.  Intramuscular midazolam for pediatric preanesthetic sedation: a double-blind controlled study with morphine.

Authors:  L Rita; F L Seleny; A Mazurek; S Y Rabins
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  The pharmacokinetics of rectal midazolam for premedication in children.

Authors:  C Saint-Maurice; C Meistelman; E Rey; C Esteve; D de Lauture; G Olive
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 7.892

4.  Preanesthetic sedation of preschool children using intranasal midazolam.

Authors:  N C Wilton; J Leigh; D R Rosen; U A Pandit
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Transmucosal administration of midazolam for premedication of pediatric patients. Comparison of the nasal and sublingual routes.

Authors:  H W Karl; J L Rosenberger; M G Larach; J M Ruffle
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 7.892

6.  [Rectal, oral and nasal premedication using midazolam in children aged 1-6 years. A comparative clinical study].

Authors:  W Tolksdorf; C Eick
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  Premedication for day case surgery. A study of oral midazolam.

Authors:  D Raybould; E G Bradshaw
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 6.955

8.  Comparison of the safety and efficacy of intranasal midazolam or sufentanil for preinduction of anesthesia in pediatric patients.

Authors:  H W Karl; A T Keifer; J L Rosenberger; M G Larach; J M Ruffle
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 7.892

9.  Intramuscular midazolam premedication in small children. A comparison with papaveretum and hyoscine.

Authors:  M B Taylor; P R Vine; D J Hatch
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 6.955

10.  Premedication with midazolam in children. Effect of intranasal, rectal and oral routes on plasma midazolam concentrations.

Authors:  J M Malinovsky; C Populaire; A Cozian; J Y Lepage; C Lejus; M Pinaud
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 6.955

View more
  8 in total

1.  Sedation of children undergoing dental treatment.

Authors:  Paul F Ashley; Mohsin Chaudhary; Liege Lourenço-Matharu
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-17

2.  Preanesthetic sedation of preschool children: Comparison of intranasal midazolam versus oral promethazine.

Authors:  Ashu Mathai; Marilynn Nazareth; Rinu Susan Raju
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2011 Jan-Jun

3.  Comparison of oral and buccal midazolam for pediatric dental sedation: a randomized, cross-over, clinical trial for efficacy, acceptance and safety.

Authors:  Sara Tavassoli-Hojjati; Majid Mehran; Roza Haghgoo; Monireh Tohid-Rahbari; Rahil Ahmadi
Journal:  Iran J Pediatr       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 0.364

4.  Effect of Intranasal Sedation Using Ketamine and Midazolam on Behavior of 3-6 Year-Old Uncooperative Children in Dental Office: A Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Majid Mehran; Sara Tavassoli-Hojjati; Nazila Ameli; Mehdi Salehi Zeinabadi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2017-01

Review 5.  Considerations for submucosal midazolam administration in combination with oral and inhaled medications for sedation of pediatric dental patients.

Authors:  Kwangwoo Baek
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2015-06-30

Review 6.  Comparing the Sedative Effect of Oral and Intranasal Midazolam and their Effect on Behavior in Pediatric Dental Patients.

Authors:  Niharika Kotian; Erulappan Muthu Ganapathi Subramanian; Ganesh Jeevanandan
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb

7.  Comparison of Oral and Intranasal Midazolam/Ketamine Sedation in 3-6-year-old Uncooperative Dental Patients.

Authors:  Masoud Fallahinejad Ghajari; Ghassem Ansari; Ali Asghar Soleymani; Shahnaz Shayeghi; Faezeh Fotuhi Ardakani
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2015-06-10

8.  Premedication with midazolam in intellectually disabled dental patients: intramuscular or oral administration? A retrospective study.

Authors:  H Hanamoto; A Boku; M Sugimura; A Oyamaguchi; M Inoue; H Niwa
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2016-07-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.