PURPOSE: To develop and validate a pharmacokinetic limited sampling model (LSM) for intravenous and oral topotecan pharmacokinetic studies in children. METHODS: Topotecan lactone concentration-time data from five trials were used to develop and validate LSM for intravenous and oral topotecan. Based on full sampling from one intravenous study (30 patients; 195 studies), a LSM for intravenous topotecan was determined using a modification of the D-optimality algorithm. For oral topotecan we used full sampling data from one oral topotecan study (27 patients; 47 studies) to develop an LSM. Accuracy and bias of each LSM were determined relative to the full sampling method. Predictive performance of the LSM was validated using additional data and Monte-Carlo simulations based on these data. RESULTS: LSM for intravenous topotecan includes: 5 min, 1.5, and 2.5 h after the end of the 30 min infusion. The median accuracy (absolute predicted error) and bias (predicted error) are < or =8% and < or =6.1%, respectively. For oral topotecan, the optimal LSM includes: 15 min, 1.5, and 6 h. The median accuracy and bias are 6% and 4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the optimal sampling times for the intravenous LSM for topotecan in children consist of: predose, and 5 min, 1.5, and 2.5 h after the end of infusion. For oral topotecan the sample times are predose, 15 min, 1.5, and 6 h after dose administration. These LSM are invaluable to children receiving topotecan because it minimizes inconvenience and blood collection.
PURPOSE: To develop and validate a pharmacokinetic limited sampling model (LSM) for intravenous and oral topotecan pharmacokinetic studies in children. METHODS:Topotecan lactone concentration-time data from five trials were used to develop and validate LSM for intravenous and oral topotecan. Based on full sampling from one intravenous study (30 patients; 195 studies), a LSM for intravenous topotecan was determined using a modification of the D-optimality algorithm. For oral topotecan we used full sampling data from one oral topotecan study (27 patients; 47 studies) to develop an LSM. Accuracy and bias of each LSM were determined relative to the full sampling method. Predictive performance of the LSM was validated using additional data and Monte-Carlo simulations based on these data. RESULTS: LSM for intravenous topotecan includes: 5 min, 1.5, and 2.5 h after the end of the 30 min infusion. The median accuracy (absolute predicted error) and bias (predicted error) are < or =8% and < or =6.1%, respectively. For oral topotecan, the optimal LSM includes: 15 min, 1.5, and 6 h. The median accuracy and bias are 6% and 4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the optimal sampling times for the intravenous LSM for topotecan in children consist of: predose, and 5 min, 1.5, and 2.5 h after the end of infusion. For oral topotecan the sample times are predose, 15 min, 1.5, and 6 h after dose administration. These LSM are invaluable to children receiving topotecan because it minimizes inconvenience and blood collection.
Authors: Marion Bouillon-Pichault; Vincent Jullien; Caroline Bazzoli; Gérard Pons; Michel Tod Journal: J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn Date: 2010-11-04 Impact factor: 2.745
Authors: Jessica K Roberts; Anna V Birg; Tong Lin; Vinay M Daryani; John C Panetta; Alberto Broniscer; Giles W Robinson; Amar J Gajjar; Clinton F Stewart Journal: Drug Metab Dispos Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 3.922
Authors: Clinton F Stewart; Michael Tagen; Lee S Schwartzberg; L Johnetta Blakely; Kurt W Tauer; Linda M Smiley Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Ibrahim Qaddoumi; Catherine A Billups; Michael Tagen; Clinton F Stewart; Jianrong Wu; Kathleen Helton; M Beth McCarville; Thomas E Merchant; Rachel Brennan; Tammy M Free; Vicki Given; Barrett G Haik; Carlos Rodriguez-Galindo; Matthew W Wilson Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-04-19 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: K Elaine Hubbard; Paula Schaiquevich; Feng Bai; Charles H Fraga; Laura Miller; John C Panetta; Clinton F Stewart Journal: Biomed Chromatogr Date: 2009-07 Impact factor: 1.902