Literature DB >> 16046942

Automated external defibrillators: to what extent does the algorithm delay CPR?

Thomas D Rea1, Sachita Shah, Peter J Kudenchuk, Michael K Copass, Leonard A Cobb.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: Maximizing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during resuscitation may improve survival. Resuscitation protocols stack up to 3 shocks to achieve defibrillation, followed by an immediate postdefibrillation pulse check. The purpose of this study is to evaluate outcomes of rhythm reanalyses immediately after shock, stacked shocks, and initial postshock pulse checks in relation to achieving a pulse and initiating CPR.
METHODS: We conducted an observational study of patients with ventricular fibrillation treated by first-tier emergency medical services (EMS). We collected data from EMS, dispatch, and hospital records. Additionally, we analyzed automatic external defibrillator recordings to determine the proportion of cardiac arrest victims who were defibrillated and achieved a pulse according to shock number (single versus stacked shock), proportion of victims with a pulse during the initial postdefibrillation pulse check, and interval from initial shock to CPR.
RESULTS: The study included 481 cardiac arrest subjects. Automatic external defibrillators terminated ventricular fibrillation with the initial shock in 83.6% (n=402) of cases. A second shock terminated ventricular fibrillation in an additional 7.5% (n=36) of cases, and a third shock terminated ventricular fibrillation in 4.8% (n=23) of cases. The initial sequence of 3 shocks failed to terminate ventricular fibrillation in 4.1% (n=20) of cases. In total, automatic external defibrillators performed 560 rhythm reanalyses during the initial shock sequence and delivered 122 "stacked" shocks. Termination of ventricular fibrillation was not synonymous with return of a pulse. The initial shock produced a pulse that was eventually detected in 21.8% (105/481) of cases. Stacked shocks produced a pulse in 10.7% (13/122) of cases. For the 24.5 % (n=118) of cases in which a pulse returned, the pulse was detected during the initial postshock pulse check only 12 times, or 2.5% of all cases. The median interval from initial shock until CPR was 29 (23,41) seconds.
CONCLUSION: Rhythm reanalyses, stacked shocks, and postshock pulse checks had low yield for achieving or detecting return of a pulse. CPR was not initiated until 29 seconds after the initial shock.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16046942     DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2005.04.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  9 in total

1.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

2.  Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

3.  Cardiopulmonary resuscitation: when guidelines provide no answers.

Authors:  M-M Ventzke; G I Kemming
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 1.041

4.  The AED in resuscitation: it's not just about the shock.

Authors:  Richard L Page
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2011

Review 5. 

Authors:  J P Nolan; C D Deakin; J Soar; B W Böttiger; G Smith; M Baubin; B Dirks; V Wenzel
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 0.826

Review 6.  Ventricular fibrillation and defibrillation.

Authors:  P Jones; N Lodé
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.791

7.  Immediate post-shock chest compressions improve outcome from prolonged ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  Robert A Berg; Ronald W Hilwig; Marc D Berg; David D Berg; Ricardo A Samson; Julia H Indik; Karl B Kern
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 5.262

8.  The impact of peri-shock pause on survival from out-of-hospital shockable cardiac arrest during the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium PRIMED trial.

Authors:  Sheldon Cheskes; Robert H Schmicker; P Richard Verbeek; David D Salcido; Siobhan P Brown; Steven Brooks; James J Menegazzi; Christian Vaillancourt; Judy Powell; Susanne May; Robert A Berg; Rebecca Sell; Ahamed Idris; Mike Kampp; Terri Schmidt; Jim Christenson
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2013-10-25       Impact factor: 5.262

Review 9.  [Adult advanced life support].

Authors:  Jasmeet Soar; Bernd W Böttiger; Pierre Carli; Keith Couper; Charles D Deakin; Therese Djärv; Carsten Lott; Theresa Olasveengen; Peter Paal; Tommaso Pellis; Gavin D Perkins; Claudio Sandroni; Jerry P Nolan
Journal:  Notf Rett Med       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 0.826

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.