CONTEXT: Pegvisomant is a GH receptor antagonist that blocks the peripheral actions of GH in acromegaly. Pegvisomant, in contrast to somatostatin (SMS) analogs, does not suppress the activity of the GH-producing adenoma. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effects of cotreatment with pegvisomant and SMS in acromegaly on GH secretion, IGF-I levels, and glucose tolerance. DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Eleven patients with persistent disease despite previous therapy underwent the following fixed treatment algorithm: 1) on SMS therapy, 2) off therapy for 2 months, 3) 6-wk treatment with 10 mg/d pegvisomant, 4) 6-wk treatment with 15 mg/d pegvisomant, and 5) 3-month treatment with 15 mg pegvisomant plus SMS. Blood was sampled in the fasting state and during an oral glucose tolerance test. RESULTS: Total serum IGF-I levels (micrograms per liter) decreased after pegvisomant, but the lowest levels were obtained with cotreatment [458 +/- 67 (SMS), 562 +/- 78 (active), 376 +/- 51 (10 mg), 269 (15 mg), 195 +/- 24 (combined) (P < 0.0001)]. Free and bioactive IGF-I changed in a similar pattern. Steady-state pegvisomant levels (micrograms per liter) were obtained, but SMS cotreatment increased pegvisomant levels by 20% (P = 0.02) [2631 +/- 616 (10 mg), 6536 +/- 1413 (15 mg), 8030 +/- 1914 (combined)]. Pegvisomant increased endogenous GH levels (micrograms per liter), which was countered by SMS cotreatment [5.1 +/- 1.3 (SMS), 8.9 +/- 2.9 (active), 14.6 +/- 4.9 (10 mg), 19.7 +/- 6.5 (15 mg), 11.8 +/- 2.8 (combined) (P < 0.01)]. Plasma glucose levels (millimoles per liter) were highest during SMS and lowest during pegvisomant 15 mg [2-h oral glucose tolerance test: 10.3 +/- 0.7 (SMS), 8.9 +/- 0.7 (active), 7.2 +/- 0.7 (10 mg), 6.5 +/- 0.5 (15 mg), 8.0 +/- 0.8 (combined) (P = 0.02)]. CONCLUSIONS: Dual blockade of the GH axis with pegvisomant and a SMS analog is feasible in acromegaly.
CONTEXT: Pegvisomant is a GH receptor antagonist that blocks the peripheral actions of GH in acromegaly. Pegvisomant, in contrast to somatostatin (SMS) analogs, does not suppress the activity of the GH-producing adenoma. OBJECTIVE: We assessed the effects of cotreatment with pegvisomant and SMS in acromegaly on GH secretion, IGF-I levels, and glucose tolerance. DESIGN, PATIENTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: Eleven patients with persistent disease despite previous therapy underwent the following fixed treatment algorithm: 1) on SMS therapy, 2) off therapy for 2 months, 3) 6-wk treatment with 10 mg/d pegvisomant, 4) 6-wk treatment with 15 mg/d pegvisomant, and 5) 3-month treatment with 15 mg pegvisomant plus SMS. Blood was sampled in the fasting state and during an oral glucose tolerance test. RESULTS: Total serum IGF-I levels (micrograms per liter) decreased after pegvisomant, but the lowest levels were obtained with cotreatment [458 +/- 67 (SMS), 562 +/- 78 (active), 376 +/- 51 (10 mg), 269 (15 mg), 195 +/- 24 (combined) (P < 0.0001)]. Free and bioactive IGF-I changed in a similar pattern. Steady-state pegvisomant levels (micrograms per liter) were obtained, but SMS cotreatment increased pegvisomant levels by 20% (P = 0.02) [2631 +/- 616 (10 mg), 6536 +/- 1413 (15 mg), 8030 +/- 1914 (combined)]. Pegvisomant increased endogenous GH levels (micrograms per liter), which was countered by SMS cotreatment [5.1 +/- 1.3 (SMS), 8.9 +/- 2.9 (active), 14.6 +/- 4.9 (10 mg), 19.7 +/- 6.5 (15 mg), 11.8 +/- 2.8 (combined) (P < 0.01)]. Plasma glucose levels (millimoles per liter) were highest during SMS and lowest during pegvisomant 15 mg [2-h oral glucose tolerance test: 10.3 +/- 0.7 (SMS), 8.9 +/- 0.7 (active), 7.2 +/- 0.7 (10 mg), 6.5 +/- 0.5 (15 mg), 8.0 +/- 0.8 (combined) (P = 0.02)]. CONCLUSIONS: Dual blockade of the GH axis with pegvisomant and a SMS analog is feasible in acromegaly.
Authors: A Colao; G Arnaldi; P Beck-Peccoz; S Cannavò; R Cozzi; E degli Uberti; L De Marinis; E De Menis; D Ferone; V Gasco; A Giustina; S Grottoli; G Lombardi; P Maffei; E Martino; F Minuto; R Pivonello; E Ghigo Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: A Giustina; A Barkan; P Chanson; A Grossman; A Hoffman; E Ghigo; F Casanueva; A Colao; S Lamberts; M Sheppard; S Melmed Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 4.256