OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect on prevalence of diarrhoea and mortality of household based treatment of drinking water with flocculant-disinfectant, sodium hypochlorite, and standard practices in areas with turbid water source in Africa. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial over 20 weeks. SETTING: Family compounds, each containing several houses, in rural western Kenya. PARTICIPANTS: 6650 people in 605 family compounds. INTERVENTION: Water treatment: flocculant-disinfectant, sodium hypochlorite, and usual practice (control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of diarrhoea and all cause mortality. Escherichia coli concentration, free residual chlorine concentration, and turbidity in household drinking water as surrogates for effectiveness of water treatment. RESULTS: In children < 2 years old, compared with those in the control compounds, the absolute difference in prevalence of diarrhoea was -25% in the flocculant-disinfectant arm (95% confidence interval -40 to -5) and -17% in the sodium hypochlorite arm (-34 to 4). In all age groups compared with control, the absolute difference in prevalence was -19% in the flocculant-disinfectant arm (-34 to -2) and -26% in the sodium hypochlorite arm (-39 to -9). There were significantly fewer deaths in the intervention compounds than in the control compounds (relative risk of death 0.58, P = 0.036). Fourteen per cent of water samples from control compounds had E coli concentrations < 1 CFU/100 ml compared with 82% in flocculant-disinfectant and 78% in sodium hypochlorite compounds. The mean turbidity of drinking water was 8 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) in flocculant-disinfectant households, compared with 55 NTU in the two other compounds (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In areas of turbid water, flocculant-disinfectant was associated with a significant reduction in diarrhoea among children < 2 years. This health benefit, combined with a significant reduction in turbidity, suggests that the flocculant-disinfectant is well suited to areas with highly contaminated and turbid water.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the effect on prevalence of diarrhoea and mortality of household based treatment of drinking water with flocculant-disinfectant, sodium hypochlorite, and standard practices in areas with turbid water source in Africa. DESIGN: Cluster randomised controlled trial over 20 weeks. SETTING: Family compounds, each containing several houses, in rural western Kenya. PARTICIPANTS: 6650 people in 605 family compounds. INTERVENTION: Water treatment: flocculant-disinfectant, sodium hypochlorite, and usual practice (control). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Prevalence of diarrhoea and all cause mortality. Escherichia coli concentration, free residual chlorine concentration, and turbidity in household drinking water as surrogates for effectiveness of water treatment. RESULTS: In children < 2 years old, compared with those in the control compounds, the absolute difference in prevalence of diarrhoea was -25% in the flocculant-disinfectant arm (95% confidence interval -40 to -5) and -17% in the sodium hypochlorite arm (-34 to 4). In all age groups compared with control, the absolute difference in prevalence was -19% in the flocculant-disinfectant arm (-34 to -2) and -26% in the sodium hypochlorite arm (-39 to -9). There were significantly fewer deaths in the intervention compounds than in the control compounds (relative risk of death 0.58, P = 0.036). Fourteen per cent of water samples from control compounds had E coli concentrations < 1 CFU/100 ml compared with 82% in flocculant-disinfectant and 78% in sodium hypochlorite compounds. The mean turbidity of drinking water was 8 nephelometric turbidity units (NTU) in flocculant-disinfectant households, compared with 55 NTU in the two other compounds (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In areas of turbid water, flocculant-disinfectant was associated with a significant reduction in diarrhoea among children < 2 years. This health benefit, combined with a significant reduction in turbidity, suggests that the flocculant-disinfectant is well suited to areas with highly contaminated and turbid water.
Authors: R E Quick; L V Venczel; E D Mintz; L Soleto; J Aparicio; M Gironaz; L Hutwagner; K Greene; C Bopp; K Maloney; D Chavez; M Sobsey; R V Tauxe Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: P B Bloland; T K Ruebush; J B McCormick; J Ayisi; D A Boriga; A J Oloo; R Beach; W Hawley; A Lal; B Nahlen; V Udhayakumar; C C Campbell Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 1999-04 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: R L Shapiro; M R Otieno; P M Adcock; P A Phillips-Howard; W A Hawley; L Kumar; P Waiyaki; B L Nahlen; L Slutsker Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 1999-02 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: R L Shapiro; L Kumar; P Phillips-Howard; J G Wells; P Adcock; J Brooks; M L Ackers; J B Ochieng; E Mintz; S Wahlquist; P Waiyaki; L Slutsker Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2001-04-25 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Philip F Souter; Graeme D Cruickshank; Melanie Z Tankerville; Bruce H Keswick; Brian D Ellis; Don E Langworthy; Kathy A Metz; Martin R Appleby; Nicola Hamilton; Amanda L Jones; John D Perry Journal: J Water Health Date: 2003-06 Impact factor: 1.744
Authors: Elizabeth Blanton; Sam Ombeki; Gordon Otieno Oluoch; Alex Mwaki; Kathleen Wannemuehler; Rob Quick Journal: Am J Trop Med Hyg Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 2.345
Authors: C E O'Reilly; M C Freeman; M Ravani; J Migele; A Mwaki; M Ayalo; S Ombeki; R M Hoekstra; R Quick Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2007-02-19 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Sandy Cairncross; Caroline Hunt; Sophie Boisson; Kristof Bostoen; Val Curtis; Isaac C H Fung; Wolf-Peter Schmidt Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 7.196