Literature DB >> 16046426

An assessment of clinically optimal gold marker length and diameter for pelvic radiotherapy verification using an amorphous silicon flat panel electronic portal imaging device.

A M Henry1, J Stratford, J Davies, C McCarthy, R Swindell, J Sykes, C J Moore, P Price, V S Khoo.   

Abstract

Verification of target organ position is essential for the accurate delivery of conformal radiotherapy. Megavoltage electronic portal imaging with flat panel amorphous silicon detectors delivers high quality images that can be used for verification of bony landmark position. Gold markers implanted into the target organ can be visualized and used as a surrogate of actual organ position. On-line compensation for marker displacement, by adjusting patient position, can reduce geometric errors associated with radiation delivery. This study assesses the optimal marker length and diameter to be used with an amorphous silicon (a-Si) flat panel detector and electronic portal images (EPIs), prior to implementation of a clinical programme of gold marker insertion in prostate cancer patients. Seven marker sizes varying from 3 mm to 8 mm in length and 0.8 mm to 1.1 mm in diameter were investigated in a group of patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy using an 8 MV Elekta SL20 linear accelerator. Markers were placed on the skin entry and exit sites of the treatment beam and EPIs in both lateral and anterior pelvic views were acquired. Three observers independently assessed visibility success and failure using a subjective scoring system. Markers less than 5 mm in length or 0.9 mm in diameter were poorly visualized (<70% visualization success in lateral EPIs). The marker measuring 0.9 mm x 5 mm appears to be clinically optimal in pelvic radiotherapy patients (80% visualization success in lateral EPIs) and will be used for actual organ implantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16046426     DOI: 10.1259/bjr/97956788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  4 in total

1.  Numerical deconvolution to enhance sharpness and contrast of portal images for radiotherapy patient positioning verification.

Authors:  H K Looe; Y Uphoff; D Harder; B Poppe; K C Willborn
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Qualitative evaluation of fiducial markers for radiotherapy imaging.

Authors:  Maria F Chan; Gil'ad N Cohen; Joseph O Deasy
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-09-16

3.  Investigation of dose perturbations and the radiographic visibility of potential fiducials for proton radiation therapy of the prostate.

Authors:  Jessie Y Huang; Wayne D Newhauser; X Ronald Zhu; Andrew K Lee; Rajat J Kudchadker
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2011-07-28       Impact factor: 3.609

4.  Comparative analysis of traditional and coiled fiducials implanted during EUS for pancreatic cancer patients receiving stereotactic body radiation therapy.

Authors:  Mouen A Khashab; Katherine J Kim; Erik J Tryggestad; Aaron T Wild; Teboh Roland; Vikesh K Singh; Anne Marie Lennon; Eun Ji Shin; Mark A Ziegler; Reem Z Sharaiha; Marcia Irene Canto; Joseph M Herman
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 9.427

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.