OBJECTIVES: Commercial headgear is currently being used by football players of all ages and skill levels to provide protection from heading and direct impact. The clinical and biomechanical effectiveness of the headgear in attenuating these types of impact is not well defined or understood. This study was conducted to determine whether football headgear has an effect on head impact responses. METHODS: Controlled laboratory tests were conducted with a human volunteer and surrogate head/neck system. The impact attenuation of three commercial headgears during ball impact speeds of 6-30 m/s and in head to head contact with a closing speed of 2-5 m/s was quantified. The human subject, instrumented to measure linear and angular head accelerations, was exposed to low severity impacts during heading in the unprotected and protected states. High severity heading contact and head to head impacts were studied with a biofidelic surrogate headform instrumented to measure linear and angular head responses. Subject and surrogate responses were compared with published injury assessment functions associated with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). RESULTS: For ball impacts, none of the headgear provided attenuation over the full range of impact speeds. Head responses with or without headgear were not significantly different (p>0.05) and remained well below levels associated with MTBI. In head to head impact tests the headgear provided an overall 33% reduction in impact response. CONCLUSION: The football headgear models tested did not provide benefit during ball impact. This is probably because of the large amount of ball deformation relative to headband thickness. However, the headgear provided measurable benefit during head to head impacts.
OBJECTIVES: Commercial headgear is currently being used by football players of all ages and skill levels to provide protection from heading and direct impact. The clinical and biomechanical effectiveness of the headgear in attenuating these types of impact is not well defined or understood. This study was conducted to determine whether football headgear has an effect on head impact responses. METHODS: Controlled laboratory tests were conducted with a human volunteer and surrogate head/neck system. The impact attenuation of three commercial headgears during ball impact speeds of 6-30 m/s and in head to head contact with a closing speed of 2-5 m/s was quantified. The human subject, instrumented to measure linear and angular head accelerations, was exposed to low severity impacts during heading in the unprotected and protected states. High severity heading contact and head to head impacts were studied with a biofidelic surrogate headform instrumented to measure linear and angular head responses. Subject and surrogate responses were compared with published injury assessment functions associated with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). RESULTS: For ball impacts, none of the headgear provided attenuation over the full range of impact speeds. Head responses with or without headgear were not significantly different (p>0.05) and remained well below levels associated with MTBI. In head to head impact tests the headgear provided an overall 33% reduction in impact response. CONCLUSION: The football headgear models tested did not provide benefit during ball impact. This is probably because of the large amount of ball deformation relative to headband thickness. However, the headgear provided measurable benefit during head to head impacts.
Authors: Kevin M Guskiewicz; Stephen W Marshall; Steven P Broglio; Robert C Cantu; Donald T Kirkendall Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2002 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Steven P Broglio; Robert C Cantu; Gerard A Gioia; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Jeffrey Kutcher; Michael Palm; Tamara C Valovich McLeod Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2014-03-07 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Steven Rowson; Megan L Bland; Eamon T Campolettano; Jaclyn N Press; Bethany Rowson; Jake A Smith; David W Sproule; Abigail M Tyson; Stefan M Duma Journal: Sports Med Arthrosc Rev Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 1.985
Authors: Ryan T Tierney; Michael Higgins; Shane V Caswell; Jessica Brady; Krista McHardy; Jeffrey B Driban; Kurosh Darvish Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2008 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Weihong Yuan; Jonathan Dudley; Kim D Barber Foss; Jonathan D Ellis; Staci Thomas; Ryan T Galloway; Christopher A DiCesare; James L Leach; Janet Adams; Thomas Maloney; Brooke Gadd; David Smith; Jeff N Epstein; Dustin R Grooms; Kelsey Logan; David R Howell; Mekibib Altaye; Gregory D Myer Journal: J Neurotrauma Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 5.269
Authors: Timothy McGuine; Eric Post; Adam Yakuro Pfaller; Scott Hetzel; Allison Schwarz; M Alison Brooks; Stephanie A Kliethermes Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 2019-05-14 Impact factor: 13.800