Literature DB >> 16046034

Nutritional assessment and management in hospitalised patients: implication for DRG-based reimbursement and health care quality.

J Ockenga1, M Freudenreich, R Zakonsky, K Norman, M Pirlich, H Lochs.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition is associated with a higher morbidity resulting in an increased need for medical resources and economic expenses. In order to ensure sufficient nutritional care it is mandatory to identify the effect of malnutrition and nutritional care on direct cost and reimbursement. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the economic effect of a nutritional screening procedure on the identification and coding of malnutrition in the G-DRG system.
METHODS: All G-DRG relevant parameters of 541 consecutive patients at a gastroenterology ward were documented. Moreover, all patients were screened for malnutrition by a dietician according to the subjective global assessment (SGA). Patients were then grouped into the appropriate G-DRG and the effective cost weight (CW) was calculated.
RESULTS: Ninety-two of 541 patients (19%) were classified malnourished (SGA B or C). Recognition of malnutrition increase from 4% to 19%. Malnourished patients exhibited a significantly increased length of hospital stay (7.7+/-7 to 11+/-9, P<0.0001). In 26/98 (27%) patients, the coding of malnutrition was considered relevant by grouping and resulted in a rise of DRG benefit. Mean case mix value and patients' complexity and comorbidity level (PCCL) increased after including malnutrition in the codification (CV 1.53+/-2.9 to 1.65+/-2.9, P=0.001 and PCCL 2.69+/-1.4 to 3.47+/-0.82, P<0.0001). The reimbursement increase by 360/malnourished patient or an additional reimbursement of 35280 (8.3% of the total reimbursement for all patients of 423186). Nutritional support in a subgroup of 50 randomly selected patients resulted in additional costs of 10268 . Forty-four of these patients (86%) were classified malnourished (32 SGA B and 12 SGA C). However, the subsequent reimbursement covered only approximately 75% of the expenses (7869), but did not include the potential financial benefits resulting from clinical interventions.
CONCLUSION: Malnourished patients can be detected with a structured assessment and documentation of nutritional status and this is partly reflected in the G-DRG/ICD 10 system. In addition to increasing direct health care reimbursement, nutritional screening and intervention has the potential to improve health care quality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16046034     DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2005.05.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Nutr        ISSN: 0261-5614            Impact factor:   7.324


  13 in total

Review 1.  Emerging Impact of Malnutrition on Surgical Patients: Literature Review and Potential Implications for Cystectomy in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Conrad M Tobert; Jill M Hamilton-Reeves; Lyse A Norian; Chermaine Hung; Nathan A Brooks; Jeff M Holzbeierlein; Tracy M Downs; Douglas P Robertson; Ruth Grossman; Kenneth G Nepple
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Nutrition therapy cost analysis in the US: pre-mixed multi-chamber bag vs compounded parenteral nutrition.

Authors:  Robin S Turpin; Todd Canada; Frank Xiaoqing Liu; Catherine J Mercaldi; Alessandro Pontes-Arruda; Paul Wischmeyer
Journal:  Appl Health Econ Health Policy       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 2.561

3.  Nutritional supplementation affects postoperative oxidative stress and duration of hospitalization in patients with hip fracture.

Authors:  Elisabeth Fabian; Inge Gerstorfer; Heinrich W Thaler; Heinrich Stundner; Pia Biswas; Ibrahim Elmadfa
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2011-01-21       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 4.  Malnutrition in hospital: the clinical and economic implications.

Authors:  Christian Löser
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-12-27       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Cholecystectomy and Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs): patient classification and hospital reimbursement in 11 European countries.

Authors:  Gerli Paat-Ahi; Ain Aaviksoo; Maria Swiderek
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2014-11-13

Review 6.  Hospital malnutrition: prevalence, identification and impact on patients and the healthcare system.

Authors:  Lisa A Barker; Belinda S Gout; Timothy C Crowe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Clinical impact of malnutrition on complication rate and length of stay in elective ENT patients: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  U Kisser; J Kufeldt; C Adderson-Kisser; S Becker; P Baumeister; M Reiter; U Harréus; M N Thomas; P Rittler
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Malnutrition in Hospitals: It Was, Is Now, and Must Not Remain a Problem!

Authors:  Peter C Konturek; Hans J Herrmann; Kristin Schink; Markus F Neurath; Yurdagül Zopf
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-10-02

9.  Health economic analyses in medical nutrition: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Stefan Walzer; Daniel Droeschel; Mark Nuijten; Hélène Chevrou-Séverac
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2014-03-10

Review 10.  Health economics evidence for medical nutrition: are these interventions value for money in integrated care?

Authors:  Stefan Walzer; Daniel Droeschel; Mark Nuijten; Hélène Chevrou-Séverac
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2014-05-19
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.