Literature DB >> 16045519

Risk scoring system for prediction of obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Abimbola Williams1, Douglas G Tincello, Sarah White, Elisabeth J Adams, Zarko Alfirevic, David H Richmond.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to begin the process of developing an antenatal risk scoring system, as a first step towards examining whether elective Caesarean section for women at high risk of injury could be an effective and acceptable intervention.
DESIGN: Retrospective study.
SETTING: Tertiary maternity unit in the UK. POPULATION: One hundred and twenty-three women who sustained an obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) and 123 controls without OASI.
METHODS: Case notes of women with a third or fourth degree tear between 1997 and 1999 were examined for risk factors. Controls matched for age and week of delivery were identified from the maternity record database and case records reviewed for the presence of risk factors. Unweighted and weighted risk scores were produced using odds ratios, and compared between cases and controls. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve analysis of the risk scores was performed to discriminate between cases and controls and to calculate the sensitivity and specificity of each scoring system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each risk factor. Sensitivity and specificity from ROC curves for weighted and unweighted risk score.
RESULTS: Among the cases there were more nulliparous women (OR 1.77; CI 1.05-2.99) and a trend towards more women with an episiotomy (OR 1.57; CI 0.99-2.47). Among women with sphincter injury, trends towards more epidurals (OR 1.64; CI 0.97-2.75), and more babies weighing more than 4000 g among (OR 1.45; CI 0.85-2.49) were noted. The median unweighted risk score was 2 for cases and 2 for controls (P= 0.05), while the weighted risk score was 2.1 and 1.37 (P= 0.03), respectively. The ROC curves approximated to a straight line demonstrating very poor discrimination between cases and controls.
CONCLUSION: The predictive test performed poorly, suggesting that the risk factors identified do not exert a large enough effect in a cohort of this size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16045519     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2005.00652.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJOG        ISSN: 1470-0328            Impact factor:   6.531


  8 in total

1.  Decreased rate of obstetrical anal sphincter laceration is associated with change in obstetric practice.

Authors:  Steven M Minaglia; Begüm Ozel; Nicole M Gatto; Lisa Korst; Daniel R Mishell; David A Miller
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-03-28

2.  Is increased peripheral ligamentous laxity in term pregnant women associated with obstetric anal sphincter injury?

Authors:  Bertrand Gachon; Marion Desgranges; Laetitia Fradet; Arnaud Decatoire; Florian Poireault; Fabrice Pierre; Xavier Fritel; David Desseauve
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 3.  Can pelvic floor injury secondary to delivery be prevented?

Authors:  Yuval Lavy; Peter K Sand; Chava I Kaniel; Drorith Hochner-Celnikier
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2011-08-06       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Bowel disturbances are the most important risk factors for late onset fecal incontinence: a population-based case-control study in women.

Authors:  Adil E Bharucha; Alan R Zinsmeister; Cathy D Schleck; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Is the Outcome Indicator "3rd/4th Degree Perineal Tear in Spontaneous Singleton Births" a Reliable Quality Parameter in Obstetrics?

Authors:  H B G Franz; C W J Erxleben
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.915

6.  Does water birth affect the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury? Development of a prognostic model.

Authors:  Helen Louise Preston; Zarko Alfirevic; Gillian Elizabeth Fowler; Steven Lane
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-02-19       Impact factor: 2.894

7.  The impact of third- or fourth-degree perineal tears on the second pregnancy: A cohort study of 182,445 Scottish women.

Authors:  Andrea Mary Woolner; Dolapo Ayansina; Mairead Black; Sohinee Bhattacharya
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Incidence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries after training to protect the perineum: cohort study.

Authors:  Katariina Laine; Finn Egil Skjeldestad; Leiv Sandvik; Anne Cathrine Staff
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 2.692

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.