Literature DB >> 16045425

Decision research strategies.

Baruch Fischhoff1.   

Abstract

Cancer poses many, often difficult choices. Studying these choices poses several strategic decisions for researchers, including (a) whether to conduct formal analyses of the choices being studied, (b) whether to adopt a persuasive stance (or only facilitate independent decision making), (c) whether to focus on optimizing specific choices or securing broader mastery, and (d) which individual differences to address. Behavioral decision research's strategic approach is demonstrated in 4 contexts relevant to cancer-related decisions: (a) informed consent, (b) prevention, (c) infectious disease, and (d) medical emergencies. Each example contains interacting elements of normative analysis, identifying optimal choices; descriptive research, characterizing actual behavior; and prescriptive interventions, seeking to bridge the gap between the normative ideal and the descriptive reality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16045425     DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.4.S9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  4 in total

1.  Communicating Numerical Risk: Human Factors That Aid Understanding in Health Care.

Authors:  Priscila G Brust-Renck; Caisa E Royer; Valerie F Reyna
Journal:  Rev Hum Factors Ergon       Date:  2013-10

2.  Patient Preferences in Shared Decision Making During Healthcare and Associated Factors Among Adult Admitted Patients at Public Hospitals of West Shoa Oromia, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Yonas Gurmu
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2022-07-26       Impact factor: 2.314

3.  A behavior-theoretic evaluation of values clarification on parental beliefs and intentions toward genomic sequencing for newborns.

Authors:  Ryan S Paquin; Susana Peinado; Megan A Lewis; Barbara B Biesecker; Christine Rini; Myra Roche; Rita M Butterfield; Cynthia M Powell; Jonathan S Berg; Donald B Bailey
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  A Procedure for Eliciting Women's Preferences for Breast Cancer Screening Frequency.

Authors:  Emily Grayek; Yanran Yang; Baruch Fischhoff; Karen E Schifferdecker; Steven Woloshin; Karla Kerlikowske; Diana L Miglioretti; Anna N A Tosteson
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2022-01-22       Impact factor: 2.749

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.