PURPOSE: To determine and compare the shapes of the retinas of emmetropic and myopic eyes. METHODS: Nonrotationally symmetrical ellipsoids were mathematically fitted to the retinal surfaces of 21 emmetropic and 66 myopic eyes (up to -12 D) of participants aged 18 to 36 years (mean, 25.5) using transverse axial and sagittal images derived from magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: The shapes of the ellipsoids varied considerably between subjects with similar refractive errors. The shapes were oblate (steepening toward the equator) in most of the emmetropic eyes (i.e., the axial dimensions of the ellipsoids were smaller than both the vertical and horizontal dimensions). As myopia increased, all ellipsoid dimensions increased with the axial dimension increasing more than the vertical dimension, which in turn increased more than the horizontal dimension (increases in approximate ratios 3:2:1). The relative difference in the increase of these dimensions meant that as the degree of myopia increased the retinal shape decreased in oblateness. However, few myopic eyes were prolate (flattening toward the equator). Independent of myopia, the ellipsoids were tilted about the vertical axis by 11 degrees +/- 13 degrees , and ellipsoid centers were decentered horizontally by 0.5 +/- 0.4 mm nasally and 0.2 +/- 0.5 mm inferiorly, relative to the fovea. CONCLUSIONS: In general both emmetropic and myopic retinas are oblate in shape, although myopic eyes less so. This finding may be relevant to theories implicating the peripheral retina in the development of myopia.
PURPOSE: To determine and compare the shapes of the retinas of emmetropic and myopic eyes. METHODS: Nonrotationally symmetrical ellipsoids were mathematically fitted to the retinal surfaces of 21 emmetropic and 66 myopic eyes (up to -12 D) of participants aged 18 to 36 years (mean, 25.5) using transverse axial and sagittal images derived from magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS: The shapes of the ellipsoids varied considerably between subjects with similar refractive errors. The shapes were oblate (steepening toward the equator) in most of the emmetropic eyes (i.e., the axial dimensions of the ellipsoids were smaller than both the vertical and horizontal dimensions). As myopia increased, all ellipsoid dimensions increased with the axial dimension increasing more than the vertical dimension, which in turn increased more than the horizontal dimension (increases in approximate ratios 3:2:1). The relative difference in the increase of these dimensions meant that as the degree of myopia increased the retinal shape decreased in oblateness. However, few myopic eyes were prolate (flattening toward the equator). Independent of myopia, the ellipsoids were tilted about the vertical axis by 11 degrees +/- 13 degrees , and ellipsoid centers were decentered horizontally by 0.5 +/- 0.4 mm nasally and 0.2 +/- 0.5 mm inferiorly, relative to the fovea. CONCLUSIONS: In general both emmetropic and myopic retinas are oblate in shape, although myopic eyes less so. This finding may be relevant to theories implicating the peripheral retina in the development of myopia.
Authors: Pavan K Verkicharla; Marwan Suheimat; James M Pope; Farshid Sepehrband; Ankit Mathur; Katrina L Schmid; David A Atchison Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2015-08-05 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: Juan Huang; Li-Fang Hung; Ramkumar Ramamirtham; Terry L Blasdel; Tammy L Humbird; Kurt H Bockhorst; Earl L Smith Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2009-05-06 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Ryan P McNabb; James Polans; Brenton Keller; Moseph Jackson-Atogi; Charlene L James; Robin R Vann; Joseph A Izatt; Anthony N Kuo Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2018-12-21 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: James M Pope; Pavan K Verkicharla; Farshid Sepehrband; Marwan Suheimat; Katrina L Schmid; David A Atchison Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2017-04-05 Impact factor: 3.732
Authors: David Alonso-Caneiro; Scott A Read; Stephen J Vincent; Michael J Collins; Maciej Wojtkowski Journal: Biomed Opt Express Date: 2016-01-21 Impact factor: 3.732