OBJECTIVE: To compare brain activity identified by fMRI in subjects with Alzheimer disease (AD) and older healthy controls (HCs) performing an episodic/working memory (EWM) and semantic memory (SM) task. METHODS: Nine AD (mean age 73.6) and 10 HC (mean age 71.8) subjects underwent an fMRI memory paradigm. Tasks comprised 1) baseline (recognizing a single digit presented for 1 second), 2) SM (addition of two single digits, always producing a single digit answer), and 3) EWM (recall of the previous single digit on the stimulus of the next digit). Each condition was presented in 2-minute blocks with a shorter and longer time interval for the first and second minute within blocks. RESULTS: Comparing AD and HC subjects, there were no activated brain regions in common for EWM > SM, but left anterior cingulate (Brodmann area [BA] 24, 0, 31, 4) and left medial frontal lobe gyrus (BA 25, -6, 23, -15) were activated by both groups for SM > EWM. Key differences were that for EWM > SM, HC subjects activated the right parahippocampal gyrus, whereas subjects with AD activated the right superior frontal gyrus and left uncus. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with Alzheimer disease (AD) recruited brain regions for easier episodic/working memory (EWM) tasks used by healthy controls (HCs) for more difficult EWM tasks. AD subjects recruited brain regions for semantic memory tasks used by HCs for more difficult EWM tasks. The authors propose a functional "memory reserve" model of compensatory recruitment according to task difficulty and underlying neuropathology.
OBJECTIVE: To compare brain activity identified by fMRI in subjects with Alzheimer disease (AD) and older healthy controls (HCs) performing an episodic/working memory (EWM) and semantic memory (SM) task. METHODS: Nine AD (mean age 73.6) and 10 HC (mean age 71.8) subjects underwent an fMRI memory paradigm. Tasks comprised 1) baseline (recognizing a single digit presented for 1 second), 2) SM (addition of two single digits, always producing a single digit answer), and 3) EWM (recall of the previous single digit on the stimulus of the next digit). Each condition was presented in 2-minute blocks with a shorter and longer time interval for the first and second minute within blocks. RESULTS: Comparing AD and HC subjects, there were no activated brain regions in common for EWM > SM, but left anterior cingulate (Brodmann area [BA] 24, 0, 31, 4) and left medial frontal lobe gyrus (BA 25, -6, 23, -15) were activated by both groups for SM > EWM. Key differences were that for EWM > SM, HC subjects activated the right parahippocampal gyrus, whereas subjects with AD activated the right superior frontal gyrus and left uncus. CONCLUSIONS: Subjects with Alzheimer disease (AD) recruited brain regions for easier episodic/working memory (EWM) tasks used by healthy controls (HCs) for more difficult EWM tasks. AD subjects recruited brain regions for semantic memory tasks used by HCs for more difficult EWM tasks. The authors propose a functional "memory reserve" model of compensatory recruitment according to task difficulty and underlying neuropathology.
Authors: Soong Ho Kim; Paul E Fraser; David Westaway; Peter H St George-Hyslop; Michelle E Ehrlich; Sam Gandy Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2010-03-17 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Stefan J Teipel; Alexander Drzezga; Peter Bartenstein; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Markus Schwaiger; Harald Hampel Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2006-06-01 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Paul R Borghesani; L Clark Johnson; Amy L Shelton; Elaine R Peskind; Elizabeth H Aylward; Gerard D Schellenberg; Monique M Cherrier Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2007-03-09 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Demet Ilhan Algin; Suna Dagli Atalay; Serhat Ozkan; Demet Ozbabalik Adapinar; Ilknur Ak Sivrioz Journal: J Int Med Res Date: 2017-06-29 Impact factor: 1.671
Authors: Simon R Cox; Mark E Bastin; Karen J Ferguson; Mike Allerhand; Natalie A Royle; Susanna Muñoz Maniega; John M Starr; Alasdair M J MacLullich; Joanna M Wardlaw; Ian J Deary; Sarah E MacPherson Journal: Cortex Date: 2014-08-21 Impact factor: 4.027