Literature DB >> 16043379

Prognosis of hypercalcemia in aerodigestive tract cancers: study of 136 recent cases.

Nicolas Penel1, Céline Berthon, Frédéric Everard, Jean-Charles Neu, Stéphanie Clisant, Michèle N'guyen, Stéphanie Villet, Charles Fournier, Jean-Louis Lefebvre.   

Abstract

Recent data issuing the prognostic impact of hypercalcemia on outcome of aerodigestive tract cancers are spare. To assess the prognosis and the survival of head and neck cancer patients with hypercalcemia, we reviewed 136 recent successive cases, including also oesophageal and lung cancers. Data were collected from a retrospective database (July 2002-January 2004). Hypercalcemia was defined by calcemia level above 2.55 mmol/l. Univariate analysis for prognosis was performed with Mann-Whitney test (continuous variables) and Odd Ratio with 95% confidence interval (categorical variables). The primary locations were : oropharynx and oral cavity (79, 58%), hypopharynx (13, 9.5%), larynx (10, 7.3%), oesophagus (17, 12.5%) and lung (17, 12.5%). There were 23 females and 123 males, with a median age of 53 (18-86). The incidence of bone metastasis was low: 20/136, 14.5%. At cancer diagnosis, 32 hypercalcemia were observed. With a median follow-up of 88 days (2-553), we observed 98 deaths (overall mortality=72%). The median overall survival was 35 days (2-553+). The pejorative prognostic factors were: male gender (OR=2.64 CI 95% 1.07-6.82), age inferior to 50 (OR=2.67 CI 95% 1.23-5.8), presence of distant metastasis (OR=4.45 CI 95% 1.8-11.01), elevation of alkaline phosphatases (OR=7 CI 95% 2.73-17.9) and need of hospitalization for intravenous hydratation (OR=5.11 CI 95% 1.99-13.17). We observed 39 recurrences of hypercalcemia. The predictive factors for recurrence of hypercalcemia were: age superior to 50 (OR=4.61 CI 95% 2.02-10.52), male gender (OR=38.22 CI 95% 12.2-89), calcemia level superior to 2.7 mmol/l (OR=3.08 CI 95% 1.42-6.64) and absence of diphosphonates (bisphosphonates: OR=2.16 CI 95% 1.01-4.63). Despite use of diphosphonates (infusions of pamidronate), hypercalcemia is associated with very poor prognosis. Tumour location and level of calcemia had no prognostic value.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16043379     DOI: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2005.04.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Oncol        ISSN: 1368-8375            Impact factor:   5.337


  6 in total

1.  Livedo reticularis heralding hypercalcaemia of malignancy.

Authors:  Deepak Sundriyal; Naveen Kumar; Gaurav Kumar; Meenu Walia
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-05-15

2.  Hypercalcemia of Malignancy: Time to Pull the Brakes.

Authors:  Deepak Sundriyal; Lima Arya; Rajat Saha; Meenu Walia; Priya P Nayak
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-06-11

3.  Cancer-associated hypercalcemia treated with intravenous diphosphonates: a survival and prognostic factor analysis.

Authors:  Nicolas Penel; Sylvain Dewas; Philippe Doutrelant; Stéphanie Clisant; Yazdan Yazdanpanah; Antoine Adenis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-08-21       Impact factor: 3.603

4.  Hypercalcemia in patients of oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  P V Nimonkar; R M Borle
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2009-11-21

5.  A systematically structured review of biomarkers of dying in cancer patients in the last months of life; An exploration of the biology of dying.

Authors:  Victoria Louise Reid; Rachael McDonald; Amara Callistus Nwosu; Stephen R Mason; Chris Probert; John E Ellershaw; Séamus Coyle
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Malignancy-Related Hypercalcemia in Advanced Solid Tumors: Survival Outcomes.

Authors:  Ricardo Emanuel de Oliveira Ramos; Milena Perez Mak; Michel Fabiano Silva Alves; Gustavo Henrique Munhoz Piotto; Tiago Kenji Takahashi; Leonardo Gomes da Fonseca; Marina Cavalcanti Maroja Silvino; Paulo Marcelo Hoff; Gilberto de Castro
Journal:  J Glob Oncol       Date:  2017-03-15
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.