BACKGROUND: Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) is a strong candidate gene for schizophrenia and cognitive functions disrupted in this disorder. This report examines the relation of COMT genotypes to performance on a battery of working memory tests differing in the cognitive operations to be performed on the material. METHODS: A large sample of 402 healthy adults were tested on four working memory tests: Spatial Delayed Response (SDR), Word Serial Position Test (WSPT), N-back, and Letter-Number Sequencing. A subsample (n = 246) was tested on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). A saliva swab was used to obtain DNA from all participants. RESULTS: Letter-Number Sequencing, which requires both storage and manipulation of information, was the only working memory test that showed expected differences among COMT genotypes, with the met/met group showing the best performance and the val/val group the poorest performance. As in previous studies, the met/met group also performed better than the val/val group on the WCST. CONCLUSIONS: COMT genotypes were not associated with performance on tests measuring simple storage, maintenance of temporal order or updating of information in working memory. Genotype differences in Letter-Number Sequencing and WCST suggest that higher-order components of processing (e.g., mental manipulation) are more closely related to this gene.
BACKGROUND:Catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) is a strong candidate gene for schizophrenia and cognitive functions disrupted in this disorder. This report examines the relation of COMT genotypes to performance on a battery of working memory tests differing in the cognitive operations to be performed on the material. METHODS: A large sample of 402 healthy adults were tested on four working memory tests: Spatial Delayed Response (SDR), Word Serial Position Test (WSPT), N-back, and Letter-Number Sequencing. A subsample (n = 246) was tested on the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST). A saliva swab was used to obtain DNA from all participants. RESULTS: Letter-Number Sequencing, which requires both storage and manipulation of information, was the only working memory test that showed expected differences among COMT genotypes, with the met/met group showing the best performance and the val/val group the poorest performance. As in previous studies, the met/met group also performed better than the val/val group on the WCST. CONCLUSIONS:COMT genotypes were not associated with performance on tests measuring simple storage, maintenance of temporal order or updating of information in working memory. Genotype differences in Letter-Number Sequencing and WCST suggest that higher-order components of processing (e.g., mental manipulation) are more closely related to this gene.
Authors: Michael J Sulik; Nancy Eisenberg; Tracy L Spinrad; Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant; Gregory Swann; Kassondra M Silva; Mark Reiser; Daryn A Stover; Brian C Verrelli Journal: Dev Psychopathol Date: 2014-08-27
Authors: D Scheggia; E Zamberletti; N Realini; M Mereu; G Contarini; V Ferretti; F Managò; G Margiani; R Brunoro; T Rubino; M A De Luca; D Piomelli; D Parolaro; F Papaleo Journal: Mol Psychiatry Date: 2017-06-20 Impact factor: 15.992
Authors: Maureen E Bowers; George A Buzzell; Virginia Salo; Sonya V Troller-Renfree; Colin A Hodgkinson; David Goldman; Elena Gorodetsky; Jennifer Martin McDermott; Heather A Henderson; Nathan A Fox Journal: Dev Psychobiol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 3.038
Authors: G G Potter; W D Taylor; D R McQuoid; D C Steffens; K A Welsh-Bohmer; K R R Krishnan Journal: Int J Geriatr Psychiatry Date: 2009-10 Impact factor: 3.485
Authors: Moriah E Thomason; Robert F Dougherty; Natalie L Colich; Lee M Perry; Elena I Rykhlevskaia; Hugo M Louro; Joachim F Hallmayer; Christian E Waugh; Roland Bammer; Gary H Glover; Ian H Gotlib Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2010-01-18 Impact factor: 6.556