Literature DB >> 16041678

Fetal growth in Peru: comparisons with international fetal size charts and implications for fetal growth assessment.

M Merialdi1, L E Caulfield, N Zavaleta, A Figueroa, K A Costigan, F Dominici, J A Dipietro.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To compare fetal biometry measurements obtained in a Peruvian population with reference fetal size charts obtained in Peruvian and non-Peruvian populations.
METHODS: Fetal biometry measurements collected prospectively in 195 uncomplicated pregnancies were included in the presented analysis. At 20, 24, 28, 32, 36 and 38 weeks' gestation, fetal head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur diaphysis length were measured. Fetal biometry measurements were compared with fetal size charts obtained from another Peruvian and two non-Peruvian populations from North America and Europe.
RESULTS: When compared with ultrasound-based reference fetal size charts obtained from North American and European populations, fetuses from the studied population appeared to grow more slowly with advancing gestational age. This trend was not observed when a Peruvian population, similar to the one studied here, was used as a reference.
CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that fetal growth in this Peruvian population may not be adequately assessed by using reference charts obtained from other populations and have implications for the use of growth standards in antenatal management. Copyright 2005 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16041678     DOI: 10.1002/uog.1954

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0960-7692            Impact factor:   7.299


  9 in total

1.  Fetal size in a rural melanesian population with minimal risk factors for growth restriction: an observational ultrasound study from Papua New Guinea.

Authors:  Holger W Unger; Stephan Karl; Regina A Wangnapi; Peter Siba; Glen Mola; Jane Walker; Ivo Mueller; Maria Ome; Stephen J Rogerson
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2014-11-10       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Reference values of fetal ultrasound biometry: results of a prospective cohort study in Lithuania.

Authors:  Bronius Žaliūnas; Vaidilė Jakaitė; Juozas Kurmanavičius; Daiva Bartkevičienė; Kristina Norvilaitė; Karolina Passerini
Journal:  Arch Gynecol Obstet       Date:  2022-02-27       Impact factor: 2.493

Review 3.  Defining normal and abnormal fetal growth: promises and challenges.

Authors:  Jun Zhang; Mario Merialdi; Lawrence D Platt; Michael S Kramer
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Development of a fetal weight chart using serial trans-abdominal ultrasound in an East African population: a longitudinal observational study.

Authors:  Christentze Schmiegelow; Thomas Scheike; Mayke Oesterholt; Daniel Minja; Caroline Pehrson; Pamela Magistrado; Martha Lemnge; Vibeke Rasch; John Lusingu; Thor G Theander; Birgitte Bruun Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Unconditional and conditional standards for fetal abdominal circumference and estimated fetal weight in an ethnic Chinese population: a birth cohort study.

Authors:  Ying Xu; Ngee Lek; Yin Bun Cheung; Arijit Biswas; Lin Lin Su; Kenneth Y C Kwek; George S H Yeo; Shu-E Soh; Seang-Mei Saw; Peter D Gluckman; Yap-Seng Chong
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Scientific basis for standardization of fetal head measurements by ultrasound: a reproducibility study.

Authors:  R Napolitano; V Donadono; E O Ohuma; C L Knight; S Z Wanyonyi; B Kemp; T Norris; A T Papageorghiou
Journal:  Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 7.299

7.  The choice of reference chart affects the strength of the association between malaria in pregnancy and small for gestational age: an individual participant data meta-analysis comparing the Intergrowth-21 with a Tanzanian birthweight chart.

Authors:  George Mtove; Daniel T R Minja; Omari Abdul; Samwel Gesase; Kenneth Maleta; Titus H Divala; Noel Patson; Ulla Ashorn; Miriam K Laufer; Mwayiwawo Madanitsa; Per Ashorn; Don Mathanga; Jobiba Chinkhumba; Julie R Gutman; Feiko O Ter Kuile; Sofie Lykke Møller; Ib C Bygbjerg; Michael Alifrangis; Thor Theander; John P A Lusingu; Christentze Schmiegelow
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  WHO multicentre study for the development of growth standards from fetal life to childhood: the fetal component.

Authors:  Mario Merialdi; Mariana Widmer; Ahmet Metin Gülmezoglu; Hany Abdel-Aleem; George Bega; Alexandra Benachi; Guillermo Carroli; Jose Guilherme Cecatti; Anke Diemert; Rogelio Gonzalez; Kurt Hecher; Lisa N Jensen; Synnøve L Johnsen; Torvid Kiserud; Alka Kriplani; Pisake Lumbiganon; Ann Tabor; Sameera A Talegawkar; Antoinette Tshefu; Daniel Wojdyla; Lawrence Platt
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Fetal biometric parameters: Reference charts for a non-selected risk population from Uberaba, Brazil.

Authors:  Alberto Borges Peixoto; Taciana Mara Rodrigues da Cunha Caldas; Fernando Felix Dulgheroff; Wellington P Martins; Edward Araujo Júnior
Journal:  J Ultrason       Date:  2017-03-31
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.