Literature DB >> 16041470

Hardware-related complications of deep brain stimulation: a ten year experience.

P Blomstedt1, M I Hariz.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the occurrence of hardware-related complications in patients with deep brain stimulation (DBS), over a long period of time.
METHOD: All patients operated on with DBS at our institution between 1993 and 2002 were followed with respect to adverse events related to the implanted hardware.
RESULTS: One hundred and nineteen consecutive patients underwent 139 procedures with implantation of 161 electrodes. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. The follow-up time was 540 electrode-years. The rate of hardware-related complications per electrode-year was 4.3%. In total, 17 patients (15%) had 23 hardware-related complications. These included 8 electrode breakages, 4 electrode migrations, 2 stimulator migrations, 3 erosions, 2 erosions and infections, 2 infections and 2 cases of stimulator malfunction. The majority of these complications occurred during the first four years in our experience.
CONCLUSIONS: DBS is a life-long therapy that requires a life-long follow-up. Increased experience and adaptation of surgical technique are the main determinants for avoidance of hardware-related complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16041470     DOI: 10.1007/s00701-005-0576-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)        ISSN: 0001-6268            Impact factor:   2.216


  32 in total

1.  Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  S J Groiss; L Wojtecki; M Südmeyer; A Schnitzler
Journal:  Ther Adv Neurol Disord       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 6.570

Review 2.  Deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Patricia Limousin; Irene Martinez-Torres
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 7.620

Review 3.  Unusual complications of deep brain stimulation.

Authors:  Fumin Tong; Adolfo Ramirez-Zamora; Lucy Gee; Julie Pilitsis
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-10-25       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 4.  Deep Brain Stimulation Emergencies: How the New Technologies Could Modify the Current Scenario.

Authors:  Giovanni Cossu; Mariachiara Sensi
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 5.081

5.  Deep brain stimulation for medically refractory life-threatening status dystonicus in children.

Authors:  Brian P Walcott; Brian V Nahed; Kristopher T Kahle; Ann-Christine Duhaime; Nutan Sharma; Emad N Eskandar
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Deep brain stimulation hardware-related infections: 10-year experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Kingsley O Abode-Iyamah; Hsiu-Yin Chiang; Royce W Woodroffe; Brian Park; Francis J Jareczek; Yasunori Nagahama; Nolan Winslow; Loreen A Herwaldt; Jeremy D W Greenlee
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 5.115

7.  Lead Fractures in Deep Brain Stimulation during Long-Term Follow-Up.

Authors:  Fernando Seijo Fernández; Marco Antonio Alvarez Vega; Aida Antuña Ramos; Fernando Fernández González; Beatriz Lozano Aragoneses
Journal:  Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2009-12-13

8.  Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: efficacy and safety.

Authors:  Nader Pouratian; Sandeep Thakkar; Won Kim; Jeff M Bronstein
Journal:  Degener Neurol Neuromuscul Dis       Date:  2012-09-04

9.  Delayed cerebritis after bilateral stereotactic implantation of globus pallidus interna electrodes for treatment of dystonia.

Authors:  Pawel P Jankowski; Stephanie Lessig; Andrew D Nguyen; David Barba
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2013-02-01

Review 10.  Identification and management of deep brain stimulation intra- and postoperative urgencies and emergencies.

Authors:  Takashi Morishita; Kelly D Foote; Adam P Burdick; Yoichi Katayama; Takamitsu Yamamoto; Steven J Frucht; Michael S Okun
Journal:  Parkinsonism Relat Disord       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 4.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.