Literature DB >> 16040880

The implications of the David Glass case for future clinical practice in the UK.

A C Elias-Jones1, J Samanta.   

Abstract

A recent decision of the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) raises issues of considerable importance to medical practitioners and paediatricians in particular. The case concerns the parental right to withhold consent to medical intervention that doctors believe to be necessary in a child's best interests. The dramatic facts of this case (in which a boy's family felt they had to fight for his life) has significant repercussions for clinical practice. This is discussed in the light of previous and recent cases that have involved babies, infants and children. The worrying trend to use the Courts to resolve these difficult clinical cases is discussed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Death and Euthanasia; Legal Approach; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16040880      PMCID: PMC1720508          DOI: 10.1136/adc.2004.070672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Dis Child        ISSN: 0003-9888            Impact factor:   3.791


  3 in total

Review 1.  Tongue piercing and insertion of metal studs: three cases of dental and oral consequences.

Authors:  D Ram; B Peretz
Journal:  ASDC J Dent Child       Date:  2000 Sep-Oct

Review 2.  The Human Rights Act 1998 and medical treatment: time for re-examination.

Authors:  L E Hagger
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.791

3.  Unusual nasal foreign body detected on routine dental radiography: case report.

Authors:  O M Yassin; F N Hattab
Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.065

  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  Re: The implications of the David Glass case for future clinical practice in the UK.

Authors:  C Essex
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.791

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.