Literature DB >> 16039623

Donor site morbidity in cross-finger flaps.

H Koch1, A Kielnhofer, M Hubmer, E Scharnagl.   

Abstract

As relevant literature is scarce, this study was undertaken to assess the donor site morbidity of cross-finger flaps. It included 23 patients who had undergone reconstruction of a finger defect with a cross-finger flap. Any additional trauma to the donor finger was an exclusion criterion. Split thickness skin grafts were employed for donor site closure in 13 cases, full thickness skin grafts were used in 10 cases. Follow-up time averaged 83 months. Active and passive total range of motion of the donor finger and maximal pinch grip strength in kilopascals were measured. Both parameters were compared to the corresponding finger of the other hand. The donor site scar was evaluated for instability and pain in the donor finger was determined subjectively with a visual analogue scale. Cold intolerance and the cosmetic appearance of the donor site were also assessed. Active total range of motion of the donor fingers averaged 156 degrees . Average active total range of motion of the contralateral control fingers was 173.6 degrees . There was a significant difference between the donor fingers and the control fingers (p = 0.03) but not between split thickness and full thickness grafted donor sites (p = 0.91). Grip strength was significantly impaired in the donor fingers (p = 0.03), but there was no significant difference between split thickness and full thickness grafted donor sites. Subjective cosmetic evaluation by the patients revealed significantly better results for full thickness grafted donor sites. Donor finger pain averaged 2.4 with a range of 0-8. Five of the 13 patients with split thickness grafted donor sites and two of the 10 patients with full thickness grafted donor sites mentioned cold intolerance. In conclusion, the cross-finger flap is a secure and valuable option. There is, however, significant donor site morbidity. Our results suggest that alternative solutions should also be considered and if a cross-finger flap is employed, donor sites should be closed with full thickness grafts.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16039623     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.04.047

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Plast Surg        ISSN: 0007-1226


  4 in total

1.  Digital coverage with flaps from the same or neighboring digits.

Authors:  L K Papatheodorou; Z H Dailiana; S E Varitimidi; M E Hantes; G K Basdekis; K N Malizos
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 0.471

2.  Comparison of Clinical Outcomes of Heterodigital Neurovascular Island Flap, Reverse Homodigital Neurovascular Island Flap, and Cross-Finger Flap Used for Fingertip Reconstruction.

Authors:  K Gurbuz; F Dogar; Y Yontar
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  Time of return back to work and complications following cross-finger flaps in industrial workers: Comparison between immediate post operative mobilization versus immobilization until flap division.

Authors:  M M Al-Qattan
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2017-11-28

4.  Double cross finger flaps from the middle to the index or ring finger: A case series of 4 patients with an emphasis on donor finger morbidity.

Authors:  Omar M Al-Qattan; Abdulaziz A Almobarak; Mohammad M Al-Qattan
Journal:  Int J Surg Case Rep       Date:  2018-03-26
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.