Literature DB >> 16038944

Seasonal variability of benthic indices: an approach to test the applicability of different indices for ecosystem quality assessment.

Henning Reiss1, Ingrid Kröncke.   

Abstract

In recent studies, several benthic biological indices were developed or used to assess the ecological quality status of marine environments. In the present study the seasonal variability of several univariate and multimetric indices was studied on a monthly scale (September 2000 until May 2002) in different areas of the North Sea such as the German Bight, the Oyster Ground and the Dogger Bank. The stations were chosen to reflect a gradient in the hydrographic regime, temperature and organic matter supply. The seasonal variability was highest for the univariate indices such as the Shannon-Wiener Index and the Hurlbert Index. Thus, due to sensitivity to recruitment the corresponding ecological status ranged from 'good' to 'poor' depending on the season. For the multimetric indices such as the AMBI or the BQI the seasonal variability and the corresponding ecological status were low. The results are discussed concerning possible consequences for ecological quality assessment especially related to the Water Framework Directive (WFD).

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16038944     DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2005.06.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mar Pollut Bull        ISSN: 0025-326X            Impact factor:   5.553


  7 in total

1.  Ecological quality status evaluation of a monsoonal tropical estuary using benthic indices: comparison via a seasonal approach.

Authors:  Heidy Q Dias; Soniya Sukumaran; Tatiparthi Srinivas; Jyoti Mulik
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Structure of the benthic macrofauna of an anthropogenic influenced area: Skhira Bay (Gulf of Gabès, central Mediterranean Sea).

Authors:  Lobna Boudaya; Nawfel Mosbahi; Jean-Claude Dauvin; Lassad Neifar
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 4.223

3.  Environmental effects of crude oil spill on the physicochemical and hydrobiological characteristics of the Nun River, Niger Delta.

Authors:  Augustine O Ifelebuegu; Justina E Ukpebor; Anita U Ahukannah; Ernest O Nnadi; Stephen C Theophilus
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Environmental Impact of Offshore Gas Activities on the Benthic Environment: A Case Study.

Authors:  E Punzo; A Gomiero; A N Tassetti; P Strafella; A Santelli; V Salvalaggio; A Spagnolo; G Scarcella; A M De Biasi; L Kozinkova; G Fabi
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-05-09       Impact factor: 3.266

5.  Freshwater lake ecosystem health assessment and its response to pollution stresses based on planktonic index of biotic integrity.

Authors:  Huayong Zhang; Zhengda Duan; Zhongyu Wang; Meifang Zhong; Wang Tian; Hualin Wang; Hai Huang
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  An approach for the identification of exemplar sites for scaling up targeted field observations of benthic biogeochemistry in heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  C E L Thompson; B Silburn; M E Williams; T Hull; D Sivyer; L O Amoudry; S Widdicombe; J Ingels; G Carnovale; C L McNeill; R Hale; C Laguionie Marchais; N Hicks; H E K Smith; J K Klar; J G Hiddink; J Kowalik; V Kitidis; S Reynolds; E M S Woodward; K Tait; W B Homoky; S Kröger; S Bolam; J A Godbold; J Aldridge; D J Mayor; N M A Benoist; B J Bett; K J Morris; E R Parker; H A Ruhl; P J Statham; M Solan
Journal:  Biogeochemistry       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 4.825

7.  COVID-19 Pandemic Lockdown: An Excellent Opportunity to Study the Effects of Trawling Disturbance on Macrobenthic Fauna in the Shallow Waters of the Gulf of Gabès (Tunisia, Central Mediterranean Sea).

Authors:  Nawfel Mosbahi; Jean-Philippe Pezy; Jean-Claude Dauvin; Lassad Neifar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.