BACKGROUND: Tumor suppressor p53 mutations are associated with the transition of prostate cancer to metastatic, hormone-refractory disease and stable expression of p53 gain-of-function (p53GOF) alleles support growth of LNCaP in androgen-depleted medium. In this study, we performed gene expression profiling of four LNCaP-p53GOF sublines to test the hypothesis that different p53GOF mutants mediated androgen independence via modulation of a common set of genes. METHODS: Expression profiling was performed using Affymetrix HG-U95Av2 arrays followed by hierarchical clustering to identify expression patterns associated with particular molecular alterations. p53GOF-mediated regulation of Id-1 expression was validated by RT-PCR and dual-luciferase reporter assays. RNA interference was used to investigate the effects of Id-1 and Id-3 suppression. RESULTS: LNCaP-p53GOF sublines possessed a molecular signature consisting of 95 differentially regulated genes that could be segregated into two clusters of transcripts induced (n=50) and repressed (n=45) by p53GOF expression. To begin validating these genes as effectors of the p53 mutants, we evaluated one of the overexpressed genes, Id-1. RT-PCR confirmed the microarray results and revealed elevated Id-1 levels in LNCaP-p53-P151S (loss-of-function only mutant), thereby implicating p53 mutational inactivation, but not gain-of-function, as a basis for Id-1 deregulation. Reporter assays demonstrated enhanced Id-1 promoter activity in an LNCaP-p53GOF subline. The contribution of Id-1 to p53GOF-mediated biology was demonstrated by the ability of RNAi-mediated gene silencing to decrease both basal and androgen-independent proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: While different p53GOF mutants result in overall distinct expression profiles, they share a common set of differentially-expressed genes that can be used to signify their presence and provide insight into mechanisms underlying androgen independence. Copyright (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Tumor suppressor p53 mutations are associated with the transition of prostate cancer to metastatic, hormone-refractory disease and stable expression of p53 gain-of-function (p53GOF) alleles support growth of LNCaP in androgen-depleted medium. In this study, we performed gene expression profiling of four LNCaP-p53GOF sublines to test the hypothesis that different p53GOF mutants mediated androgen independence via modulation of a common set of genes. METHODS: Expression profiling was performed using Affymetrix HG-U95Av2 arrays followed by hierarchical clustering to identify expression patterns associated with particular molecular alterations. p53GOF-mediated regulation of Id-1 expression was validated by RT-PCR and dual-luciferase reporter assays. RNA interference was used to investigate the effects of Id-1 and Id-3 suppression. RESULTS: LNCaP-p53GOF sublines possessed a molecular signature consisting of 95 differentially regulated genes that could be segregated into two clusters of transcripts induced (n=50) and repressed (n=45) by p53GOF expression. To begin validating these genes as effectors of the p53 mutants, we evaluated one of the overexpressed genes, Id-1. RT-PCR confirmed the microarray results and revealed elevated Id-1 levels in LNCaP-p53-P151S (loss-of-function only mutant), thereby implicating p53 mutational inactivation, but not gain-of-function, as a basis for Id-1 deregulation. Reporter assays demonstrated enhanced Id-1 promoter activity in an LNCaP-p53GOF subline. The contribution of Id-1 to p53GOF-mediated biology was demonstrated by the ability of RNAi-mediated gene silencing to decrease both basal and androgen-independent proliferation. CONCLUSIONS: While different p53GOF mutants result in overall distinct expression profiles, they share a common set of differentially-expressed genes that can be used to signify their presence and provide insight into mechanisms underlying androgen independence. Copyright (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Timo Quante; Benjamin Otto; Marie Brázdová; Iva Kejnovská; Wolfgang Deppert; Genrich V Tolstonog Journal: Cell Cycle Date: 2012-08-21 Impact factor: 4.534
Authors: William S Holland; Clifford G Tepper; Jose E Pietri; Danielle C Chinn; David R Gandara; Philip C Mack; Primo N Lara Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Yiqiang Zhao; Wyatt T Clark; Matthew Mort; David N Cooper; Predrag Radivojac; Sean D Mooney Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2011-09-09 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Damian J Junk; Lukas Vrba; George S Watts; Marc M Oshiro; Jesse D Martinez; Bernard W Futscher Journal: Neoplasia Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 5.715
Authors: P A J Muller; A G Trinidad; P Timpson; J P Morton; S Zanivan; P V E van den Berghe; C Nixon; S A Karim; P T Caswell; J E Noll; C R Coffill; D P Lane; O J Sansom; P M Neilsen; J C Norman; K H Vousden Journal: Oncogene Date: 2012-05-14 Impact factor: 9.867