Literature DB >> 16037891

Delayed latency of peroneal reflex to sudden inversion with ankle taping or bracing.

N Shima1, A Maeda, K Hirohashi.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine the effects of ankle taping and bracing based on the peroneal reflex in the hypermobile and normal ankle joints with and without history of ankle injury. Thirty-six ankle joints of 18 collegiate American football athletes with and without previous history of injury were studied. The angle of talar tilt (TT) was measured by stress radiograph for classifying normal (TT</=5 degrees ) or hypermobile (TT>5 degrees ) ankles. They were tested with taping, bracing, and without any supports as a control. The latency of peroneus longus muscle was measured by a sudden inversion of 25 degrees using surface EMG signals. The results of the present study show no significant three-way Group (hypermobile or normal ankles) by History (previously injured or uninjured ankles) by Condition (control, taping, or bracing) interaction, while Condition main effect was significant (p<0.05). There were significant differences between control (80.8 ms) and taping (83.8 ms, p<0.01), between control and bracing (83.0 ms, p<0.05), but not between taping and bracing (p>0.05). In conclusion, ankle taping and bracing delayed the peroneal reflex latency not only for hypermobile ankles and/or injured ankle joints but also for intact ankle joints.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16037891     DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-821064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  5 in total

Review 1.  A physiological and psychological basis for anti-pronation taping from a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Melinda Franettovich; Andrew Chapman; Peter Blanch; Bill Vicenzino
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Factors Contributing to Chronic Ankle Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Systematic Reviews.

Authors:  Cassandra Thompson; Siobhan Schabrun; Rick Romero; Andrea Bialocerkowski; Jaap van Dieen; Paul Marshall
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Foot structure and muscle reaction time to a simulated ankle sprain.

Authors:  Joanna R Denyer; Naomi L A Hewitt; Andrew C S Mitchell
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Ankle bracing, plantar-flexion angle, and ankle muscle latencies during inversion stress in healthy participants.

Authors:  Thomas Kernozek; Christopher J Durall; Allison Friske; Matthew Mussallem
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2008 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 5.  Review of ankle inversion sprain simulators in the biomechanics laboratory.

Authors:  Sophia Chui-Wai Ha; Daniel Tik-Pui Fong; Kai-Ming Chan
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2015-10-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.