Literature DB >> 16037733

No difference in emergence time and early cognitive function between sevoflurane-fentanyl and propofol-remifentanil in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery.

G Magni1, F Baisi, I La Rosa, C Imperiale, V Fabbrini, M L Pennacchiotti, G Rosa.   

Abstract

Balanced anesthesia with sevoflurane-fentanyl has been widely accepted as anesthetic management for neurosurgery. Propofol-remifentanil regimen has been successfully used in various surgical settings, but a comprehensive comparison of sevoflurane-fentanyl and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing craniotomy for supratentorial intracranial surgery has not yet been done. The aim of this prospective, randomized, open-label clinical trial was to compare clinical properties of sevoflurane-fentanyl with propofol-remifentanil anesthesia in patients undergoing supratentorial intracranial surgery. The primary endpoint was to compare early postoperative recovery and cognitive functions within the two groups; we also evaluated hemodynamic events, vomiting, shivering, and pain. One hundred twenty patients (64 males; age 15-75 years) were randomized to either total intravenous anesthesia (group T) or sevoflurane anesthesia (group S). Emergence and extubation times and cognitive function (Short Orientation Memory Concentration Test [SOMCT]) were compared in the two groups. Brain swelling, incidence of hypotensive and hypertensive episodes, postoperative vomiting, shivering, and pain were also analyzed. The mean emergence time (12.2 +/- 4.9 minutes for group S versus 12.3 +/- 6.1 minutes for group T; P = 0.92) and extubation time (18.2 +/- 2.3 minutes for group S versus 18.3 +/- 2.1 minutes for group T; P = 0.80) were similar in the two groups. Average SOMCT scores, both 15 minutes after extubation (25.6 +/- 4.9 in group S versus 23.9 +/- 7.5 in group T; P = 0.14) and 45 minutes after extubation (27.3 +/- 2.2 in group S versus 26.0 +/- 5.1 in group T; P = 0.07) were also comparable. Brain swelling was present in seven and five patients in groups S and T, respectively (P = 0.76). Hypotension was present in 12% (group S) and 28% (group T) of patients (P = 0.02). Hypertension was present in 17% of patients in group S and 40% of patients in group T (P = 0.0046). Shivering was present in 18% and 25% of patients in groups T and S (P = 0.37). Our study demonstrates that there is no patient benefit of using total intravenous anesthesia with an ultra-short-acting opioid over the conventional balanced volatile technique in terms of recovery and cognitive functions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16037733     DOI: 10.1097/01.ana.0000167447.33969.16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol        ISSN: 0898-4921            Impact factor:   3.956


  21 in total

Review 1.  The Neurobiology of Anesthetic Emergence.

Authors:  Vijay Tarnal; Phillip E Vlisides; George A Mashour
Journal:  J Neurosurg Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 3.956

2.  Extubation time in neurosurgical patients: does it matter?

Authors:  Tumul Chowdhury; Ronald B Cappellani
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.078

3.  Early post-anaesthesia recovery parameters - a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Zeyad Alkandari; Stephanie L Kind; Donat R Spahn; Peter Biro
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2015-10

4.  Comparison of propofol and desflurane for postanaesthetic morbidity in patients undergoing surgery for aneurysmal SAH: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Avanish Bhardwaj; Hemant Bhagat; Vinod Kumar Grover; Nidhi Bidyut Panda; Kiran Jangra; Seelora Sahu; Navneet Singla
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Remifentanil versus fentanyl compared in a target-controlled infusion of propofol anesthesia: quality of anesthesia and recovery profile.

Authors:  Demet Coskun; Hulya Celebi; Gozde Karaca; Lale Karabiyik
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-03-13       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 6.  Integrative review: postcraniotomy pain in the brain tumour patient.

Authors:  Rebecca Elizabeth Guilkey; Diane Von Ah; Janet S Carpenter; Cynthia Stone; Claire B Draucker
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.187

7.  Recovery profile of patients undergoing nasal surgical procedures: a comparison between sevoflurane and propofol.

Authors:  Aziz Ul Haq; Mansoor Aqil; Amjad Rasheed; Rana Altaf Ahmed
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2008-07-23

8.  Superior recovery profiles of propofol-based regimen as compared to isoflurane-based regimen in patients undergoing craniotomy for primary brain tumor excision: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Yoshihide Miura; Kouhei Kamiya; Kaoru Kanazawa; Masayuki Okada; Masaki Nakane; Airi Kumasaka; Kaneyuki Kawamae
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-05-13       Impact factor: 2.078

9.  Anaesthesiological strategies in elective craniotomy: randomized, equivalence, open trial--the NeuroMorfeo trial.

Authors:  Giuseppe Citerio; Maria Grazia Franzosi; Roberto Latini; Serge Masson; Simona Barlera; Stefano Guzzetti; Antonio Pesenti
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  Target-controlled Infusion Propofol Versus Sevoflurane Anaesthesia for Emergency Traumatic Brain Surgery: Comparison of the Outcomes.

Authors:  Wan Mohd Nazaruddin Wan Hassan; Yusnizah Mohd Nasir; Rhendra Hardy Mohamad Zaini; Wan Fadzlina Wan Muhd Shukeri
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2017-10-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.