Literature DB >> 16037416

Multiple causes of high extinction risk in large mammal species.

Marcel Cardillo1, Georgina M Mace, Kate E Jones, Jon Bielby, Olaf R P Bininda-Emonds, Wes Sechrest, C David L Orme, Andy Purvis.   

Abstract

Many large animal species have a high risk of extinction. This is usually thought to result simply from the way that species traits associated with vulnerability, such as low reproductive rates, scale with body size. In a broad-scale analysis of extinction risk in mammals, we find two additional patterns in the size selectivity of extinction risk. First, impacts of both intrinsic and environmental factors increase sharply above a threshold body mass around 3 kilograms. Second, whereas extinction risk in smaller species is driven by environmental factors, in larger species it is driven by a combination of environmental factors and intrinsic traits. Thus, the disadvantages of large size are greater than generally recognized, and future loss of large mammal biodiversity could be far more rapid than expected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16037416     DOI: 10.1126/science.1116030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Science        ISSN: 0036-8075            Impact factor:   47.728


  207 in total

1.  Life history predicts risk of species decline in a stochastic world.

Authors:  Benjamin G Van Allen; Amy E Dunham; Christopher M Asquith; Volker H W Rudolf
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Phylogenetic diversity does not capture body size variation at risk in the world's mammals.

Authors:  Susanne A Fritz; Andy Purvis
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Bird population trends are linearly affected by climate change along species thermal ranges.

Authors:  Frédéric Jiguet; Vincent Devictor; Richard Ottvall; Chris Van Turnhout; Henk Van der Jeugd; Ake Lindström
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The bigger they come, the harder they fall: body size and prey abundance influence predator-prey ratios.

Authors:  Chris Carbone; Nathalie Pettorelli; Philip A Stephens
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2010-11-24       Impact factor: 3.703

5.  Population and geographic range dynamics: implications for conservation planning.

Authors:  Georgina M Mace; Ben Collen; Richard A Fuller; Elizabeth H Boakes
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Correlates of rediscovery and the detectability of extinction in mammals.

Authors:  Diana O Fisher; Simon P Blomberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Unravelling the structure of species extinction risk for predictive conservation science.

Authors:  Tien Ming Lee; Walter Jetz
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Primate extinction risk and historical patterns of speciation and extinction in relation to body mass.

Authors:  Luke J Matthews; Christian Arnold; Zarin Machanda; Charles L Nunn
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-13       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Sperm number trumps sperm size in mammalian ejaculate evolution.

Authors:  Stefan Lüpold; John L Fitzpatrick
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-11-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Declines in large wildlife increase landscape-level prevalence of rodent-borne disease in Africa.

Authors:  Hillary S Young; Rodolfo Dirzo; Kristofer M Helgen; Douglas J McCauley; Sarah A Billeter; Michael Y Kosoy; Lynn M Osikowicz; Daniel J Salkeld; Truman P Young; Katharina Dittmar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.