Literature DB >> 16037172

A comparison of Espocan and Tuohy needles for the combined spinal-epidural technique for labor analgesia.

Ingrid M Browne1, David J Birnbach, Deborah J Stein, David A O'Gorman, Maxine Kuroda.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: When using the needle-through-needle combined spinal-epidural (CSE) technique for labor analgesia, failure to obtain cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), paresthesias, and intrathecal or intravascular migration of the catheter are of concern. Epidural needles with spinal needle apertures, such as the back-hole Espocan (ES) needles, are available and may reduce these risks. We describe the efficacy and adverse events associated with a modified epidural needle (ES) versus a conventional Tuohy needle for CSE. One-hundred parturients requesting labor analgesia (CSE) were randomized into 2 groups: 50-ES 18-gauge modified epidural needle with 27-gauge Pencan atraumatic spinal needle, 50-conventional 18-gauge Tuohy needle with 27-gauge Gertie Marx atraumatic spinal needle. Information on intrathecal or intravascular catheter placement, paresthesia on introduction of spinal needle, failure to obtain CSF through the spinal needle after placement of epidural needle, unintentional dural puncture, and epidural catheter function was obtained. No intrathecal catheter placement occurred in either group. Rates of intravascular catheter placement and unintentional dural puncture were similar between the groups. Significant differences were noted regarding spinal needle-induced paresthesia (14% ES versus 42% Tuohy needles, P = 0.009) and failure to obtain CSF on first attempt (8% ES versus 28% Tuohy needles, P < 0.02). Use of ES needles for CSE significantly reduces paresthesia associated with the insertion of the spinal needle and is associated with more frequent successful spinal needle placement on the first attempt. IMPLICATIONS: The use of modified epidural needles with a back hole for combined spinal-epidural technique significantly reduces paresthesia associated with the insertion of the spinal needle and is associated with more frequent successful spinal needle placement on the first attempt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16037172     DOI: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000157162.41892.6A

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  4 in total

Review 1.  Needle gauge and tip designs for preventing post-dural puncture headache (PDPH).

Authors:  Ingrid Arevalo-Rodriguez; Luis Muñoz; Natalia Godoy-Casasbuenas; Agustín Ciapponi; Jimmy J Arevalo; Sabine Boogaard; Marta Roqué I Figuls
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-07

Review 2.  Combined spinal-epidural versus spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section.

Authors:  Scott W Simmons; Alicia T Dennis; Allan M Cyna; Matthew G Richardson; Matthew R Bright
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-10-11

3.  Failed dural puncture during needle-through-needle combined spinal-epidural anesthesia: a case series.

Authors:  A Ram Doo; Yu Seob Shin; Jin-Wook Choi; Seonwoo Yoo; Sehrin Kang; Ji-Seon Son
Journal:  J Pain Res       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.133

4.  Paramedian epidural with midline spinal in the same intervertebral space: An alternative technique for combined spinal and epidural anaesthesia.

Authors:  Deepti Saigal; Rama Wason
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-07
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.