Literature DB >> 16036459

Enhancement technologies and human identity.

David DeGrazia1.   

Abstract

As the President's Council on Bioethics emphasized in a recent report, rapid growth of biotechnologies creates increasingly many possibilities for enhancing human traits. This article addresses the claim that enhancement via biotechnology is inherently problematic for reasons pertaining to our identity. After clarifying the concept of enhancement, and providing a framework for understanding human identity, I examine the relationship between enhancement and identity. Then I investigate two identity-related challenges to biotechnological enhancements: (1) the charge of inauthenticity and (2) the charge of violating inviolable core characteristics. My thesis is that a lucid, plausible understanding of human identity largely neutralizes these charges, liberating our thinking from some seductive yet unsound objections to enhancement via biotechnology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Biomedical and Behavioral Research; Genetics and Reproduction; Health Care and Public Health; Philosophical Approach; President's Council on Bioethics

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16036459     DOI: 10.1080/03605310590960166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Philos        ISSN: 0360-5310


  8 in total

1.  Ethical Reflections on Genetic Enhancement with the Aim of Enlarging Altruism.

Authors:  David DeGrazia
Journal:  Health Care Anal       Date:  2016-09

2.  Science fiction and human enhancement: radical life-extension in the movie 'In Time' (2011).

Authors:  Johann A R Roduit; Tobias Eichinger; Walter Glannon
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2018-09

3.  [Enhancement between self-realization and self-deception].

Authors:  Bernward Gesang
Journal:  Ethik Med       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 0.474

4.  A Thomistic appraisal of human enhancement technologies.

Authors:  Jason T Eberl
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2014-08

5.  Brave New World versus Island--utopian and dystopian views on psychopharmacology.

Authors:  M H N Schermer
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2007-05-08

Review 6.  The ethical desirability of moral bioenhancement: a review of reasons.

Authors:  Jona Specker; Farah Focquaert; Kasper Raus; Sigrid Sterckx; Maartje Schermer
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Neuroethics 1995-2012. A Bibliometric Analysis of the Guiding Themes of an Emerging Research Field.

Authors:  Jon Leefmann; Clement Levallois; Elisabeth Hildt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-01       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  From 'Hard' Neuro-Tools to 'Soft' Neuro-Toys? Refocussing the Neuro-Enhancement Debate.

Authors:  Jonna Brenninkmeijer; Hub Zwart
Journal:  Neuroethics       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 1.480

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.