Literature DB >> 1603497

Determinants of parental decision to abort or continue after non-aneuploid ultrasound-detected fetal abnormalities.

P G Pryde1, N B Isada, M Hallak, M P Johnson, A E Odgers, M I Evans.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated factors influencing the decision to abort after abnormalities in the karyotypically normal fetus were found through ultrasonography.
METHODS: We reviewed all pregnancies complicated by ultrasound-detected abnormalities managed on our service from April 1990 through August 1991 (N = 262). Cases with associated karyotypic abnormalities were excluded (N = 35), as were cases diagnosed after the legal gestational age limit for abortion (N = 68). The remaining 159 cases were stratified into prognosis groups of "severe," "uncertain," and "mild."
RESULTS: The prognostic severity of the ultrasound abnormality strongly correlated with the decision to abort (P less than .0001). Rates of termination were 0, 12, and 66% in the "mild," "uncertain," and "severe" groups, respectively. The patients' age, gravidity, and parity, and the fetal gestational age at diagnosis did not differ significantly between the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: 1) In non-aneuploid pregnancies with an ultrasound diagnosis of fetal abnormality, the major predictor of the decision to abort was the severity of fetal prognosis. 2) The gestational age at diagnosis was not an important variable in the decision to abort for fetal structural abnormalities. 3) Parents who had fetuses with abnormalities associated with uncertain prognoses usually opted to continue the pregnancy. This appeared to be particularly true for defects that were potentially correctable in utero or by neonatal intervention (even if investigational).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Hutzel Hospital/Wayne State University (Detroit, MI)

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1603497

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

1.  Routine prenatal screening for congenital heart disease: what can be expected? A decision-analytic approach.

Authors:  E Buskens; E W Steyerberg; J Hess; J W Wladimiroff; D E Grobbee
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Exploring adoption with clients: the need for adoption education within the genetic counseling profession.

Authors:  Cassandra L Perry; Martha J Henry
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Experiences of prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida or hydrocephalus in parents who decide to continue with their pregnancy.

Authors:  Julie Chaplin; Robert Schweitzer; Shelley Perkoulidis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Update and Review: Supernumerary Marker Chromosomes.

Authors:  S Ungerleider
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 2.537

5.  Genetic counseling for fetal abnormalities in a South African community.

Authors:  Caryn Todd; Tabitha Haw; Jennifer Kromberg; Arnold Christianson
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2010-02-05       Impact factor: 2.537

6.  Factors influencing parental decisions to terminate pregnancies following prenatal diagnoses of major fetal anomalies at Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.

Authors:  Papapin Pusayapaibul; Jittima Manonai; Chayada Tangshewinsirikul
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 3.105

7.  Quantification of selection bias in studies of risk factors for birth defects among livebirths.

Authors:  Dominique Heinke; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Paige L Williams; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Marlene Anderka; Sarah C Fisher; Tania A Desrosiers; Gary M Shaw; Paul A Romitti; Mark A Canfield; Mahsa M Yazdy
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2020-04-06       Impact factor: 3.103

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.