C Sellars1, T Hughes, P Langhorne. 1. Department of Speech and Language Therapy, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Castle Street, Glasgow, UK, G4 0SF. Cameron.Sellars@northglasgow.scot.nhs.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Dysarthria is a common sequel of non-progressive brain damage (typically stroke and traumatic brain damage). Impairment-based therapy and a wide variety of compensatory management strategies are undertaken by speech and language therapists with this patient population. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of speech and language therapy interventions for adults with dysarthria following non-progressive brain damage. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the trials registers of the following Cochrane Groups: Stroke, Injuries, Movement Disorders and Infectious Diseases. We also searched the trials register of the Cochrane Rehabilitation and Related Therapies Field. The trials registers were last searched in September 2004. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2004), EMBASE (1980 to September 2004), CINAHL (1983 to September 2004), PsycINFO (1974 to October 2004), and Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (1983 to December 2004) were searched electronically. We handsearched the International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders (1966 to 2005, Issue 1) and selected conference proceedings, and scanned the reference lists of relevant articles. We approached colleagues and speech and language therapy training institutions to identify other possible published and unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Unconfounded randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One author assessed trial quality. Two co-authors were available to examine any potential trials for possible inclusion in the review. MAIN RESULTS: No trials of the required standard were identified. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence of the quality required by this review to support or refute the effectiveness of speech and language therapy interventions for dysarthria following non-progressive brain damage. Despite the recent commencement of a RCT of optimised speech and language therapy for communication difficulties after stroke, there continues to be an urgent need for good quality research in this area.
BACKGROUND:Dysarthria is a common sequel of non-progressive brain damage (typically stroke and traumatic brain damage). Impairment-based therapy and a wide variety of compensatory management strategies are undertaken by speech and language therapists with this patient population. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy of speech and language therapy interventions for adults with dysarthria following non-progressive brain damage. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the trials registers of the following Cochrane Groups: Stroke, Injuries, Movement Disorders and Infectious Diseases. We also searched the trials register of the Cochrane Rehabilitation and Related Therapies Field. The trials registers were last searched in September 2004. The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2004), MEDLINE (1966 to September 2004), EMBASE (1980 to September 2004), CINAHL (1983 to September 2004), PsycINFO (1974 to October 2004), and Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (1983 to December 2004) were searched electronically. We handsearched the International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders (1966 to 2005, Issue 1) and selected conference proceedings, and scanned the reference lists of relevant articles. We approached colleagues and speech and language therapy training institutions to identify other possible published and unpublished studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Unconfounded randomised controlled trials (RCTs). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One author assessed trial quality. Two co-authors were available to examine any potential trials for possible inclusion in the review. MAIN RESULTS: No trials of the required standard were identified. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence of the quality required by this review to support or refute the effectiveness of speech and language therapy interventions for dysarthria following non-progressive brain damage. Despite the recent commencement of a RCT of optimised speech and language therapy for communication difficulties after stroke, there continues to be an urgent need for good quality research in this area.
Authors: Jong Hoon Moon; Deok Gi Hong; Kye Ho Kim; Yo An Park; Suk-Chan Hahm; Sung-Jin Kim; Young Sik Won; Hwi-Young Cho Journal: J Phys Ther Sci Date: 2017-07-15
Authors: Audrey Bowen; Anne Hesketh; Emma Patchick; Alys Young; Linda Davies; Andy Vail; Andrew F Long; Caroline Watkins; Mo Wilkinson; Gill Pearl; Matthew A Lambon Ralph; Pippa Tyrrell Journal: BMJ Date: 2012-07-13