Literature DB >> 16034199

A comparison of mycolic acid analysis for nontuberculous mycobacteria identification by thin-layer chromatography and molecular methods.

Clarisse Queico Fujimura Leite1, Adalgiza da Silva Rocha, Sergio Roberto de Andrade Leite, Rosa Maria Carvalho Ferreira, Philip N Suffys, Leila de Souza Fonseca, Maria Helena Féres Saad.   

Abstract

The development of fast, inexpensive, and reliable tests to identify nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) is needed. Studies have indicated that the conventional identification procedures, including biochemical assays, are imprecise. This study evaluated a proposed alternative identification method in which 83 NTM isolates, previously identified by conventional biochemical testing and in-house M. avium IS1245-PCR amplification, were submitted to the following tests: thin-layer chromatography (TLC) of mycolic acids and PCR-restriction enzyme analysis of hsp65(PRA). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of mycolic acids and Southern blot analysis for M. avium IS1245 were performed on the strains that evidenced discrepancies on either of the above tests. Sixty-eight out of 83 (82%) isolates were concordantly identified by the presence of IS1245 and PRA and by TLC mycolic acid analysis. Discrepant results were found between the phenotypic and molecular tests in 12/83 (14.4%) isolates. Most of these strains were isolated from non-sterile body sites and were most probably colonizing in the host tissue. While TLC patterns suggested the presence of polymycobacterial infection in 3/83 (3.6%) cultures, this was the case in only one HPLC-tested culture and in none of those tested by PRA. The results of this study indicated that, as a phenotypic identification procedure, TLC mycolic acid determination could be considered a relatively simple and cost-effective method for routine screening of NTM isolates in mycobacteriology laboratory practice with a potential for use in developing countries. Further positive evidence was that this method demonstrated general agreement on MAC and M. simiae identification, including in the mixed cultures that predominated in the isolates of the disseminated infections in the AIDS patients under study. In view of the fact that the same treatment regimen is recommended for infections caused by these two species, TLC mycolic acid analysis may be a useful identification tool wherever molecular methods are unaffordable.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16034199     DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2005.tb03642.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microbiol Immunol        ISSN: 0385-5600            Impact factor:   1.955


  5 in total

1.  Nontubercular Mycobacteria in drinking water of some educational institutes in Jabalpur (M.P.), India.

Authors:  Anjana Sharma; Sachin Kumar Chandraker; Manisha Bharti
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2007-10-04       Impact factor: 2.461

Review 2.  Methodological and Clinical Aspects of the Molecular Epidemiology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Other Mycobacteria.

Authors:  Tomasz Jagielski; Alina Minias; Jakko van Ingen; Nalin Rastogi; Anna Brzostek; Anna Żaczek; Jarosław Dziadek
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 3.  Mycobacterium simiae complex infection in an immunocompetent child.

Authors:  Andrea T Cruz; Veronica K Goytia; Jeffrey R Starke
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Rapid and accurate identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex and common non-tuberculous mycobacteria by multiplex real-time PCR targeting different housekeeping genes.

Authors:  Bahram Nasr Esfahani; Hadi Rezaei Yazdi; Sharareh Moghim; Hajieh Ghasemian Safaei; Hamid Zarkesh Esfahani
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-14       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 5.  Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Cystic Fibrosis.

Authors:  Kate Skolnik; Gordon Kirkpatrick; Bradley S Quon
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Infect Dis       Date:  2016-10-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.