PURPOSE: To investigate the proportion of breast cancers arising in patients with germ line BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations expressing basal markers and developing predictive tests for identification of high-risk patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Histopathologic material from 182 tumors in BRCA1 mutation carriers, 63 BRCA2 carriers, and 109 controls, collected as part of the international Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium were immunohistochemically stained for CK14, CK5/6, CK17, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and osteonectin. RESULTS: All five basal markers were commoner in BRCA1 tumors than in control tumors (CK14: 61% versus 12%; CK5/6: 58% versus 7%; CK17: 53% versus 10%; osteonectin: 43% versus 19%; EGFR: 67% versus 21%; P < 0.0001 in each case). In a multivariate analysis, CK14, CK5/6, and estrogen receptor (ER) remained significant predictors of BRCA1 carrier status. In contrast, the frequency of basal markers in BRCA2 tumors did not differ significant from controls. CONCLUSION: The use of cytokeratin staining in combination with ER and morphology provides a more accurate predictor of BRCA1 mutation status than previously available, that may be useful in selecting patients for BRCA1 mutation testing. The high percentage of BRCA1 cases positive for EGFR suggests that specific anti-tyrosine kinase therapy may be of potential benefit in these patients.
PURPOSE: To investigate the proportion of breast cancers arising in patients with germ line BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations expressing basal markers and developing predictive tests for identification of high-risk patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Histopathologic material from 182 tumors in BRCA1 mutation carriers, 63 BRCA2 carriers, and 109 controls, collected as part of the international Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium were immunohistochemically stained for CK14, CK5/6, CK17, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and osteonectin. RESULTS: All five basal markers were commoner in BRCA1 tumors than in control tumors (CK14: 61% versus 12%; CK5/6: 58% versus 7%; CK17: 53% versus 10%; osteonectin: 43% versus 19%; EGFR: 67% versus 21%; P < 0.0001 in each case). In a multivariate analysis, CK14, CK5/6, and estrogen receptor (ER) remained significant predictors of BRCA1 carrier status. In contrast, the frequency of basal markers in BRCA2 tumors did not differ significant from controls. CONCLUSION: The use of cytokeratin staining in combination with ER and morphology provides a more accurate predictor of BRCA1 mutation status than previously available, that may be useful in selecting patients for BRCA1 mutation testing. The high percentage of BRCA1 cases positive for EGFR suggests that specific anti-tyrosine kinase therapy may be of potential benefit in these patients.
Authors: Nasim Mavaddat; Daniel Barrowdale; Irene L Andrulis; Susan M Domchek; Diana Eccles; Heli Nevanlinna; Susan J Ramus; Amanda Spurdle; Mark Robson; Mark Sherman; Anna Marie Mulligan; Fergus J Couch; Christoph Engel; Lesley McGuffog; Sue Healey; Olga M Sinilnikova; Melissa C Southey; Mary Beth Terry; David Goldgar; Frances O'Malley; Esther M John; Ramunas Janavicius; Laima Tihomirova; Thomas V O Hansen; Finn C Nielsen; Ana Osorio; Alexandra Stavropoulou; Javier Benítez; Siranoush Manoukian; Bernard Peissel; Monica Barile; Sara Volorio; Barbara Pasini; Riccardo Dolcetti; Anna Laura Putignano; Laura Ottini; Paolo Radice; Ute Hamann; Muhammad U Rashid; Frans B Hogervorst; Mieke Kriege; Rob B van der Luijt; Susan Peock; Debra Frost; D Gareth Evans; Carole Brewer; Lisa Walker; Mark T Rogers; Lucy E Side; Catherine Houghton; JoEllen Weaver; Andrew K Godwin; Rita K Schmutzler; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Alfons Meindl; Karin Kast; Norbert Arnold; Dieter Niederacher; Christian Sutter; Helmut Deissler; Doroteha Gadzicki; Sabine Preisler-Adams; Raymonda Varon-Mateeva; Ines Schönbuchner; Heidrun Gevensleben; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Muriel Belotti; Laure Barjhoux; Claudine Isaacs; Beth N Peshkin; Trinidad Caldes; Miguel de la Hoya; Carmen Cañadas; Tuomas Heikkinen; Päivi Heikkilä; Kristiina Aittomäki; Ignacio Blanco; Conxi Lazaro; Joan Brunet; Bjarni A Agnarsson; Adalgeir Arason; Rosa B Barkardottir; Martine Dumont; Jacques Simard; Marco Montagna; Simona Agata; Emma D'Andrea; Max Yan; Stephen Fox; Timothy R Rebbeck; Wendy Rubinstein; Nadine Tung; Judy E Garber; Xianshu Wang; Zachary Fredericksen; Vernon S Pankratz; Noralane M Lindor; Csilla Szabo; Kenneth Offit; Rita Sakr; Mia M Gaudet; Christian F Singer; Muy-Kheng Tea; Christine Rappaport; Phuong L Mai; Mark H Greene; Anna Sokolenko; Evgeny Imyanitov; Amanda Ewart Toland; Leigha Senter; Kevin Sweet; Mads Thomassen; Anne-Marie Gerdes; Torben Kruse; Maria Caligo; Paolo Aretini; Johanna Rantala; Anna von Wachenfeld; Karin Henriksson; Linda Steele; Susan L Neuhausen; Robert Nussbaum; Mary Beattie; Kunle Odunsi; Lara Sucheston; Simon A Gayther; Kate Nathanson; Jenny Gross; Christine Walsh; Beth Karlan; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Douglas F Easton; Antonis C Antoniou Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2011-12-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Xianshu Wang; V Shane Pankratz; Zachary Fredericksen; Robert Tarrell; Mary Karaus; Lesley McGuffog; Paul D P Pharaoh; Bruce A J Ponder; Alison M Dunning; Susan Peock; Margaret Cook; Clare Oliver; Debra Frost; Olga M Sinilnikova; Dominique Stoppa-Lyonnet; Sylvie Mazoyer; Claude Houdayer; Frans B L Hogervorst; Maartje J Hooning; Marjolijn J Ligtenberg; Amanda Spurdle; Georgia Chenevix-Trench; Rita K Schmutzler; Barbara Wappenschmidt; Christoph Engel; Alfons Meindl; Susan M Domchek; Katherine L Nathanson; Timothy R Rebbeck; Christian F Singer; Daphne Gschwantler-Kaulich; Catherina Dressler; Anneliese Fink; Csilla I Szabo; Michal Zikan; Lenka Foretova; Kathleen Claes; Gilles Thomas; Robert N Hoover; David J Hunter; Stephen J Chanock; Douglas F Easton; Antonis C Antoniou; Fergus J Couch Journal: Hum Mol Genet Date: 2010-04-23 Impact factor: 6.150
Authors: Soley Bayraktar; Angelica M Gutierrez-Barrera; Diane Liu; Tunc Tasbas; Ugur Akar; Jennifer K Litton; E Lin; Constance T Albarracin; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Banu K Arun Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-08-10 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Angelina I Londoño-Joshi; Rebecca C Arend; Laura Aristizabal; Wenyan Lu; Rajeev S Samant; Brandon J Metge; Bertha Hidalgo; William E Grizzle; Michael Conner; Andres Forero-Torres; Albert F Lobuglio; Yonghe Li; Donald J Buchsbaum Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Robert M W Hofstra; Amanda B Spurdle; Diana Eccles; William D Foulkes; Niels de Wind; Nicoline Hoogerbrugge; Frans B L Hogervorst Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: Olga K Mirzoeva; Debopriya Das; Laura M Heiser; Sanchita Bhattacharya; Doris Siwak; Rina Gendelman; Nora Bayani; Nicholas J Wang; Richard M Neve; Yinghui Guan; Zhi Hu; Zachary Knight; Heidi S Feiler; Philippe Gascard; Bahram Parvin; Paul T Spellman; Kevan M Shokat; Andrew J Wyrobek; Mina J Bissell; Frank McCormick; Wen-Lin Kuo; Gordon B Mills; Joe W Gray; W Michael Korn Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2009-01-15 Impact factor: 12.701