Satish K Garg1, Julio Rosenstock, Kirk Ways. 1. Barbara Davis Center for Childhood Diabetes, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of insulin glulisine (GLU), a new rapid-acting insulin analogue, injected 0 to 15 minutes before or immediately after meals, with regular human insulin (RHI), injected 30 to 45 minutes before meals. METHODS:Patients with type 1 diabetes (N = 860) receivedonce-daily insulin glargine and subcutaneous injections of either GLU (premeal or postmeal) or premeal RHI in this open-label, randomized, controlled, multicen-ter, parallel-group, 12-week study. RESULTS: Baseline to endpoint changes in mean gly-cated hemoglobin (as A1c equivalents) (A1c) occurred in the premeal GLU, postmeal GLU, and premeal RHI groups (-0.26%, -0.11%, and -0.13%, respectively). The reduction in A1c was greater for the premeal GLU group in comparison with the RHI group (P = 0.02) and the post-meal GLU group (P = 0.006); no significant between-treatment difference was found for postmeal GLU versus RHI. Overall, blood glucose profiles were similar in all 3 treatment groups but were significantly lower for premeal GLU 2-hour postbreakfast measurements (premeal versus postmeal GLU, P = 0.0017; premeal GLU versus RHI, P = 0.0001) and 2-hour postdinner measurements (premeal GLU versus RHI, P = 0.0001; premeal versus postmeal GLU, P = 0.0137). Severe hypoglycemic episodes were comparable for premeal GLU, postmeal GLU, and pre-meal RHI groups (8.4%, 8.4%, and 10.1%, respectively). Body weight increased (+0.3 kg) in the RHI and premeal GLU groups; however, weight decreased in the postmeal GLU group (-0.3 kg; between-treatment difference, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Better A1c reductions were obtained with premeal GLU, but postmeal administration of GLU was as safe and effective as premeal GLU or RHI in combination with insulin glargine and was not associated with weight gain.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of insulinglulisine (GLU), a new rapid-acting insulin analogue, injected 0 to 15 minutes before or immediately after meals, with regular humaninsulin (RHI), injected 30 to 45 minutes before meals. METHODS:Patients with type 1 diabetes (N = 860) received once-daily insulinglargine and subcutaneous injections of either GLU (premeal or postmeal) or premeal RHI in this open-label, randomized, controlled, multicen-ter, parallel-group, 12-week study. RESULTS: Baseline to endpoint changes in mean gly-cated hemoglobin (as A1c equivalents) (A1c) occurred in the premeal GLU, postmeal GLU, and premeal RHI groups (-0.26%, -0.11%, and -0.13%, respectively). The reduction in A1c was greater for the premeal GLU group in comparison with the RHI group (P = 0.02) and the post-meal GLU group (P = 0.006); no significant between-treatment difference was found for postmeal GLU versus RHI. Overall, blood glucose profiles were similar in all 3 treatment groups but were significantly lower for premeal GLU 2-hour postbreakfast measurements (premeal versus postmeal GLU, P = 0.0017; premeal GLU versus RHI, P = 0.0001) and 2-hour postdinner measurements (premeal GLU versus RHI, P = 0.0001; premeal versus postmeal GLU, P = 0.0137). Severe hypoglycemic episodes were comparable for premeal GLU, postmeal GLU, and pre-meal RHI groups (8.4%, 8.4%, and 10.1%, respectively). Body weight increased (+0.3 kg) in the RHI and premeal GLU groups; however, weight decreased in the postmeal GLU group (-0.3 kg; between-treatment difference, P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Better A1c reductions were obtained with premeal GLU, but postmeal administration of GLU was as safe and effective as premeal GLU or RHI in combination with insulinglargine and was not associated with weight gain.
Authors: Marília B Gomes; Roberta A Cobas; Alessandra S Matheus; Lucianne R Tannus; Carlos Antonio Negrato; Melanie Rodacki; Neuza Braga; Marilena M Cordeiro; Jorge L Luescher; Renata S Berardo; Marcia Nery; Maria do Carmo A Arruda-Marques; Luiz E Calliari; Renata M Noronha; Thais D Manna; Lenita Zajdenverg; Roberta Salvodelli; Fernanda G Penha; Milton C Foss; Maria C Foss-Freitas; Antonio C Pires; Fernando C Robles; Mariadefátimas Guedes; Sergio A Dib; Patricia Dualib; Saulo C Silva; Janice Sepulvida; Henriqueta G Almeida; Emerson Sampaio; Rosangela Rea; Ana Cristina R Faria; Balduino Tschiedel; Suzana Lavigne; Gustavo A Cardozo; Mirela J Azevedo; Luis Henrique Canani; Alessandra T Zucatti; Marisa Helena C Coral; Daniela Aline Pereira; Luiz Antonio Araujo; Monica Tolentino; Hermelinda C Pedrosa; Flaviane A Prado; Nelson Rassi; Leticia B Araujo; Reine Marie C Fonseca; Alexis D Guedes; Odelissa S Matos; Manuel Faria; Rossana Azulay; Adriana C Forti; Cristina Façanha; Ana Paula Montenegro; Renan Montenegro; Naira H Melo; Karla F Rezende; Alberto Ramos; João Sooares Felicio; Flavia M Santos; Deborah L Jezini; Marilena M Cordeiro Journal: Diabetol Metab Syndr Date: 2012-10-29 Impact factor: 3.320