Literature DB >> 16033730

Optimized Basal-bolus insulin regimens in type 1 diabetes: insulin glulisine versus regular human insulin in combination with Basal insulin glargine.

Satish K Garg1, Julio Rosenstock, Kirk Ways.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of insulin glulisine (GLU), a new rapid-acting insulin analogue, injected 0 to 15 minutes before or immediately after meals, with regular human insulin (RHI), injected 30 to 45 minutes before meals.
METHODS: Patients with type 1 diabetes (N = 860) received once-daily insulin glargine and subcutaneous injections of either GLU (premeal or postmeal) or premeal RHI in this open-label, randomized, controlled, multicen-ter, parallel-group, 12-week study.
RESULTS: Baseline to endpoint changes in mean gly-cated hemoglobin (as A1c equivalents) (A1c) occurred in the premeal GLU, postmeal GLU, and premeal RHI groups (-0.26%, -0.11%, and -0.13%, respectively). The reduction in A1c was greater for the premeal GLU group in comparison with the RHI group (P = 0.02) and the post-meal GLU group (P = 0.006); no significant between-treatment difference was found for postmeal GLU versus RHI. Overall, blood glucose profiles were similar in all 3 treatment groups but were significantly lower for premeal GLU 2-hour postbreakfast measurements (premeal versus postmeal GLU, P = 0.0017; premeal GLU versus RHI, P = 0.0001) and 2-hour postdinner measurements (premeal GLU versus RHI, P = 0.0001; premeal versus postmeal GLU, P = 0.0137). Severe hypoglycemic episodes were comparable for premeal GLU, postmeal GLU, and pre-meal RHI groups (8.4%, 8.4%, and 10.1%, respectively). Body weight increased (+0.3 kg) in the RHI and premeal GLU groups; however, weight decreased in the postmeal GLU group (-0.3 kg; between-treatment difference, P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Better A1c reductions were obtained with premeal GLU, but postmeal administration of GLU was as safe and effective as premeal GLU or RHI in combination with insulin glargine and was not associated with weight gain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16033730     DOI: 10.4158/EP.11.1.11

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endocr Pract        ISSN: 1530-891X            Impact factor:   3.443


  25 in total

1.  Letter to the editor. A study that glucose control can be achieved in 31 type 1 patients who follow a controlled diet and use an insulin pump that is programmed.

Authors:  John Walsh; Ruth Roberts
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2007-07

Review 2.  Insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes mellitus: getting better all the time.

Authors:  Chantal Mathieu; Pieter Gillard; Katrien Benhalima
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 43.330

3.  Comparable efficacy and safety of insulin glulisine and insulin lispro when given as part of a Basal-bolus insulin regimen in a 26-week trial in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Areti Philotheou; Silva Arslanian; László Blatniczky; Valentina Peterkova; Elisabeth Souhami; Thomas Danne
Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther       Date:  2011-02-03       Impact factor: 6.118

4.  Insulin glulisine.

Authors:  Dean M Robinson; Keri Wellington
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  Guidelines for optimal bolus calculator settings in adults.

Authors:  John Walsh; Ruth Roberts; Timothy Bailey
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-01-01

Review 6.  Insulin glulisine: a review of its use in the management of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Karly P Garnock-Jones; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2009-05-29       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  New insulin analogues and routes of delivery: pharmacodynamic and clinical considerations.

Authors:  Paris Roach
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Luigi F Meneghini
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2012-10-27       Impact factor: 3.633

Review 9.  Expert Group Recommendations on the Effective Use of Bolus Insulin in the Management of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.

Authors:  Rajeev Chawla; Jagat Jyoti Mukherjee; Manoj Chawla; Alok Kanungo; Meenakshi Sundaram Shunmugavelu; Ashok Kumar Das
Journal:  Med Sci (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-28

10.  Regional differences in clinical care among patients with type 1 diabetes in Brazil: Brazilian Type 1 Diabetes Study Group.

Authors:  Marília B Gomes; Roberta A Cobas; Alessandra S Matheus; Lucianne R Tannus; Carlos Antonio Negrato; Melanie Rodacki; Neuza Braga; Marilena M Cordeiro; Jorge L Luescher; Renata S Berardo; Marcia Nery; Maria do Carmo A Arruda-Marques; Luiz E Calliari; Renata M Noronha; Thais D Manna; Lenita Zajdenverg; Roberta Salvodelli; Fernanda G Penha; Milton C Foss; Maria C Foss-Freitas; Antonio C Pires; Fernando C Robles; Mariadefátimas Guedes; Sergio A Dib; Patricia Dualib; Saulo C Silva; Janice Sepulvida; Henriqueta G Almeida; Emerson Sampaio; Rosangela Rea; Ana Cristina R Faria; Balduino Tschiedel; Suzana Lavigne; Gustavo A Cardozo; Mirela J Azevedo; Luis Henrique Canani; Alessandra T Zucatti; Marisa Helena C Coral; Daniela Aline Pereira; Luiz Antonio Araujo; Monica Tolentino; Hermelinda C Pedrosa; Flaviane A Prado; Nelson Rassi; Leticia B Araujo; Reine Marie C Fonseca; Alexis D Guedes; Odelissa S Matos; Manuel Faria; Rossana Azulay; Adriana C Forti; Cristina Façanha; Ana Paula Montenegro; Renan Montenegro; Naira H Melo; Karla F Rezende; Alberto Ramos; João Sooares Felicio; Flavia M Santos; Deborah L Jezini; Marilena M Cordeiro
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 3.320

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.